親愛的廣場用戶們,新年即將開啟,我們希望您也能在 Gate 廣場上留下專屬印記,把 2026 的第一句話,留在 Gate 廣場!發布您的 #我的2026第一帖,记录对 2026 的第一句期待、願望或計劃,與全球 Web3 用戶共同迎接全新的旅程,創造專屬於你的年度開篇篇章,解鎖廣場價值 $10,000 新年專屬福利!
活動時間:2025/12/31 18:00 — 2026/01/15 23:59(UTC+8)
🎁 活動獎勵:多發多獎,曝光拉滿!
1️⃣ 2026 幸運大獎:從全部有效貼文中隨機抽取 1 位,獎勵包含:
2026U 仓位體驗券
Gate 新年限定禮盒
全年廣場首頁推薦位曝光
2️⃣ 人氣新年貼 TOP 1–10:根據發帖量及互動表現綜合排名,獎勵包含:
Gate 新年限定禮盒
廣場精選貼 5 篇推薦曝光
3️⃣ 新手首貼加成獎勵:活動前未在廣場發帖的用戶,活動期間首次發帖即可獲得:
50U 仓位體驗券
進入「新年新聲」推薦榜單,額外曝光加持
4️⃣ 基礎參與獎勵:所有符合規則的用戶中隨機抽取 20 位,贈送新年 F1 紅牛周邊禮包
參與方式:
1️⃣ 帶話題 #我的2026第一条帖 發帖,內容字數需要不少於 30 字
2️⃣ 內容方向不限,可以是以下內容:
寫給 2026 的第一句話
新年目標與計劃
Web3 領域探索及成長願景
注意事項
• 禁止抄襲、洗稿及違
UK Judge Rules Craig Wright Must Pay $516K to Proceed with Lawsuit Against Coinbase, Kraken
Craig Wright is not someone to stay out of the spotlight for a long time. In the latest development, the self-proclaimed Bitcoin creator was ordered to pay approximately $516,000 (400,000 British pounds) in security covering legal costs to pursue claims against crypto exchanges Coinbase and Kraken.
The lawsuit against Coinbase and Kraken’s parent company Payward was brought by Wright last May for several hundred billion pounds in damages, claiming that only he has the right to use the Bitcoin brand.
UK Order
In a judgment issued on Tuesday, James Mellor, a judge presiding over the England and Wales High Court, expressed skepticism about Wright’s ability to cover his legal expenses. This doubt arose from statements provided by the Australian scientist regarding his financial status to the US court proceedings involving former business partner Ira Kleiman.
Mellor revisited Wright’s previous assertions of being financially “untouchable.” Despite the evidence presented, the judge remains unconvinced of Wright’s capacity to afford the legal costs. The judge added that the evidence presented an “obscure picture” about which individuals or entities owned which Bitcoin assets Wright had easy access.
In addition to ordering Wright’s company to compensate for the security deposits, Mellor also said the infringement lawsuits against the two crypto giants should stay pending for the time being.
According to the judge, the fate of the case will hinge on the verdict of – Crypto Open Patent Alliance v Craig Steven Wright – which is expected to determine whether or not Wright is truly Satoshi Nakamoto. If Wright fails to prove himself true in the identity case, it’s highly unlikely that the trademark case would stand a chance.
Wright’s Legal Affairs
Earning the position as a controversial figure in the crypto industry, Wright has launched several lawsuits against those who called him a liar opposing claims of being Satoshi Nakamoto.
Wright slapped a similar lawsuit against a Bitcoin proponent pseudonymously known as Hodlonaut for calling him a “fraud” and “scammer” on social media. Hodlonaut, however, won the lawsuit last October. The Norwegian court ruled that Hodlonaut had “sufficient factual grounds to claim that Wright had lied and cheated in his attempt to prove that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.”