Futuros
Acesse centenas de contratos perpétuos
TradFi
Ouro
Plataforma única para ativos tradicionais globais
Opções
Hot
Negocie opções vanilla no estilo europeu
Conta unificada
Maximize sua eficiência de capital
Negociação demo
Introdução à negociação de futuros
Prepare-se para sua negociação de futuros
Eventos de futuros
Participe de eventos e ganhe recompensas
Negociação demo
Use fundos virtuais para experimentar negociações sem riscos
Lançamento
CandyDrop
Colete candies para ganhar airdrops
Launchpool
Staking rápido, ganhe novos tokens em potencial
HODLer Airdrop
Possua GT em hold e ganhe airdrops massivos de graça
Launchpad
Chegue cedo para o próximo grande projeto de token
Pontos Alpha
Negocie on-chain e receba airdrops
Pontos de futuros
Ganhe pontos de futuros e colete recompensas em airdrop
Investimento
Simple Earn
Ganhe juros com tokens ociosos
Autoinvestimento
Invista automaticamente regularmente
Investimento duplo
Lucre com a volatilidade do mercado
Soft Staking
Ganhe recompensas com stakings flexíveis
Empréstimo de criptomoedas
0 Fees
Penhore uma criptomoeda para pegar outra emprestado
Centro de empréstimos
Centro de empréstimos integrado
Centro de riqueza VIP
Planos premium de crescimento de patrimônio
Gestão privada de patrimônio
Alocação premium de ativos
Fundo Quantitativo
Estratégias quant de alto nível
Apostar
Faça staking de criptomoedas para ganhar em produtos PoS
Alavancagem Inteligente
New
Alavancagem sem liquidação
Cunhagem de GUSD
Cunhe GUSD para retornos em RWA
Why are investors suing JPMorgan over a $328M crypto Ponzi case?
The lawsuit claims JPMorgan served as Goliath’s primary bank during the operation, processing deposits and transfers to Coinbase wallets despite multiple warning signs.
More than 2,000 investors are believed to have been affected.
What the lawsuit alleges
The complaint argues that JPMorgan “provided the essential banking infrastructure” that allowed Goliath Ventures to run its operations despite red flags that investors say should have raised alarms.
According to the filing, roughly $253 million was deposited into a JPMorgan account linked to Goliath between January 2023 and June 2025.
Around $123 million was then transferred from that account to Coinbase wallets, while approximately $50 million was distributed to investors as supposed returns.
Investigators believe Goliath ultimately collected at least $328 million from more than 2,000 investors.
The complaint contends that a fraud of this scale could not have moved through a single banking channel without detection, given the magnitude and flow of funds.
How the scheme worked and who is charged
Authorities say Goliath Ventures, previously known as Gen-Z Venture Firm, accepted investor deposits through JPMorgan accounts before moving funds to cryptocurrency wallets maintained on Coinbase.
Christopher Alexander Delgado, identified as the operator behind Goliath, has been arrested on charges of wire fraud and money laundering.
The complaint also raises concerns about Know Your Customer compliance, alleging the bank knew Goliath was functioning as an unlicensed “private equity” cryptocurrency pool operator.
It further claims investor funds were commingled and used to pay earlier participants, a pattern consistent with classic Ponzi scheme mechanics.
If convicted on all counts, Delgado could face up to 30 years in federal prison.
Other banks and payment paths
Court filings indicate Goliath also maintained accounts at Bank of America.
Delgado was reportedly a co-signatory on one of the accounts held in the company’s name.
Investors were directed to deposit funds either into JPMorgan or Bank of America accounts, or send money directly to Goliath-controlled Coinbase wallets.
Investigators say Delgado held sole control over those wallets.
Responses and what happens next
The complaint was filed by investor Robby Alan Steele and legal counsel representing affected investors. The lawsuit does not yet specify a total damages amount.
Attorneys involved in the case say additional complaints may follow as more individuals and entities believed to have played a role are identified.
The strategy is aimed at pursuing claims carefully to maximize recovery for investors.
At the center of the case is whether JPMorgan failed to act on alleged warning signs while handling Goliath’s accounts.
The outcome could influence how banks monitor high-risk clients and crypto-related transactions going forward.
The post Why are investors suing JPMorgan over a $328M crypto Ponzi case? appeared first on Invezz