Bitcoin trading prices approach $86,000, but the market is facing the most adverse conditions since 2022. According to the “System Stress” report released by Checkonchain, investors are currently facing approximately $100 billion in unrealized losses, with about 60% of cash inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs being in a loss position. Even more concerning, miners are reducing hash power, further destabilizing the paper house of Bitcoin ETFs.
$80,000 Becomes the Critical Threshold for Bitcoin ETF Capital
(Source: Checkonchain)
Checkonchain’s ETF average cost basis and ETF market cap versus realized value (MVRV) charts show that the ETF cost basis and real market mean are in the same zone, approximately between $80,000 and $82,000. This makes a large portion of institutional holdings close to break-even. These anchor points are important because they link price trends to asset liabilities.
When prices are at or below the total cost basis, realized losses may increase as participants unwind on price rebounds, and liquidity could wane. Glassnode, in its Week 49 on-chain report, states that Bitcoin has been fluctuating around a short-term cost basis close to $102,700 and a true market mean near $81,300. It defines $95,000 (the cost basis’s 0.75 quantile) as the early recovery level.
Bitwise also considers the true market average around $82,000 as a support reference point and describes a support channel from approximately $82,000 to $75,000, linking this zone with IBIT’s cost basis (around $81,000) and MicroStrategy (MSTR)’s cost basis (close to $75,000). Bitwise estimates that after about a 35% price drop, unrealized losses amount to approximately $152 billion (about 6.6% of market cap).
Five Critical Price Defense Lines and Their Significance
$102,700: Short-term holding cost basis, a breach would trigger widespread profit-taking
$95,000: 0.75 cost basis quantile, a psychological level indicating early recovery
$81,000 to $82,000: True market average and ETF inflow cost basis cluster, the most critical defense line
$75,000: Support channel lower bound (MSTR cost basis reference), breaking below would trigger a chain reaction
$65,000 to $70,000: ETF capital concentration zone, holding 15.2% of ETF capital
The stress feature refers to Bitcoin ETF capital amounts between $75,000 and $85,000. However, only 2.9% of funds are in the $75,000 to $85,000 range. If prices fall below the central zone, buffer space becomes thinner. Amberdata also describes a more concentrated “fortress” zone between $65,000 and $70,000. If the market breaks through the gap at $75,000 to $85,000, this distribution could lead to a faster decline.
Tripartite Pressure Tears Market Structure
(Source: Luxor)
The fragility of the Bitcoin ETF paper house is driven not only by cost basis issues but also by resonant pressure from the ETF, miners, and sovereign bonds companies. According to Bitbo’s ETF tracker, as of December 15, the US spot Bitcoin ETF holds about 1,311,862 BTC (roughly $117.3 billion). After alternating inflows and outflows over the past two weeks, BlackRock’s IBIT holds about 778,052 BTC (roughly $69.6 billion).
Even if prices rebound, realized losses are already high. Glassnode reports that the net realized loss (30-day simple moving average) approaches $555 million daily, the highest since the FTX liquidation era. The report states that even if prices bounce from late November lows above $90,000, the situation remains precarious.
Miner pressure further exacerbates the instability of this Bitcoin ETF paper house. Luxor’s hash rate index review in November indicates the dollar hash rate price averaged about $39.82, down 17.9% quarter-over-quarter. On November 22, the price hit a historic low near $35.06. Luxor notes that the forward curve from December 2025 to April 2026 has fallen about 16% to 18% in USD terms. Checkonchain also reports that miners are reducing hash power, raising concerns about a capitulation sell-off.
A third asset class, Bitcoin sovereign bonds, is also facing capital restrictions. Reuters reports that Bitcoin asset managers purchased about $50 billion worth of Bitcoin over the past year, but many Bitcoin trades are now below their net asset value. This diminishes the advantage of issuing shares to buy more Bitcoin. When these stocks trade below the value of their holdings, the “issue stock, buy Bitcoin” flywheel effect cannot operate at scale.
Macroeconomic Linkages Amplify the Crisis
Reuters cites data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), showing that by 2025, the average correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 approaches 0.5, up from about 0.29 in 2024. The report also indicates that the correlation with the Nasdaq 100 is close to 0.52, up from approximately 0.23 in 2024, suggesting many of the declines are linked to stock risk mechanisms.
In this context, interest rates are crucial as they determine market risk appetite. Bank of America expects two more rate cuts in June and July 2026, keeping the 2026 interest rate path a focal point for risk assets. It is this causal relationship that leads Checkonchain to describe the current situation as the most adverse since 2022.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
$127 billion Bitcoin ETF is teetering! The house of cards is collapsing warning sounds
Bitcoin trading prices approach $86,000, but the market is facing the most adverse conditions since 2022. According to the “System Stress” report released by Checkonchain, investors are currently facing approximately $100 billion in unrealized losses, with about 60% of cash inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs being in a loss position. Even more concerning, miners are reducing hash power, further destabilizing the paper house of Bitcoin ETFs.
$80,000 Becomes the Critical Threshold for Bitcoin ETF Capital
(Source: Checkonchain)
Checkonchain’s ETF average cost basis and ETF market cap versus realized value (MVRV) charts show that the ETF cost basis and real market mean are in the same zone, approximately between $80,000 and $82,000. This makes a large portion of institutional holdings close to break-even. These anchor points are important because they link price trends to asset liabilities.
When prices are at or below the total cost basis, realized losses may increase as participants unwind on price rebounds, and liquidity could wane. Glassnode, in its Week 49 on-chain report, states that Bitcoin has been fluctuating around a short-term cost basis close to $102,700 and a true market mean near $81,300. It defines $95,000 (the cost basis’s 0.75 quantile) as the early recovery level.
Bitwise also considers the true market average around $82,000 as a support reference point and describes a support channel from approximately $82,000 to $75,000, linking this zone with IBIT’s cost basis (around $81,000) and MicroStrategy (MSTR)’s cost basis (close to $75,000). Bitwise estimates that after about a 35% price drop, unrealized losses amount to approximately $152 billion (about 6.6% of market cap).
Five Critical Price Defense Lines and Their Significance
$102,700: Short-term holding cost basis, a breach would trigger widespread profit-taking
$95,000: 0.75 cost basis quantile, a psychological level indicating early recovery
$81,000 to $82,000: True market average and ETF inflow cost basis cluster, the most critical defense line
$75,000: Support channel lower bound (MSTR cost basis reference), breaking below would trigger a chain reaction
$65,000 to $70,000: ETF capital concentration zone, holding 15.2% of ETF capital
The stress feature refers to Bitcoin ETF capital amounts between $75,000 and $85,000. However, only 2.9% of funds are in the $75,000 to $85,000 range. If prices fall below the central zone, buffer space becomes thinner. Amberdata also describes a more concentrated “fortress” zone between $65,000 and $70,000. If the market breaks through the gap at $75,000 to $85,000, this distribution could lead to a faster decline.
Tripartite Pressure Tears Market Structure
(Source: Luxor)
The fragility of the Bitcoin ETF paper house is driven not only by cost basis issues but also by resonant pressure from the ETF, miners, and sovereign bonds companies. According to Bitbo’s ETF tracker, as of December 15, the US spot Bitcoin ETF holds about 1,311,862 BTC (roughly $117.3 billion). After alternating inflows and outflows over the past two weeks, BlackRock’s IBIT holds about 778,052 BTC (roughly $69.6 billion).
Even if prices rebound, realized losses are already high. Glassnode reports that the net realized loss (30-day simple moving average) approaches $555 million daily, the highest since the FTX liquidation era. The report states that even if prices bounce from late November lows above $90,000, the situation remains precarious.
Miner pressure further exacerbates the instability of this Bitcoin ETF paper house. Luxor’s hash rate index review in November indicates the dollar hash rate price averaged about $39.82, down 17.9% quarter-over-quarter. On November 22, the price hit a historic low near $35.06. Luxor notes that the forward curve from December 2025 to April 2026 has fallen about 16% to 18% in USD terms. Checkonchain also reports that miners are reducing hash power, raising concerns about a capitulation sell-off.
A third asset class, Bitcoin sovereign bonds, is also facing capital restrictions. Reuters reports that Bitcoin asset managers purchased about $50 billion worth of Bitcoin over the past year, but many Bitcoin trades are now below their net asset value. This diminishes the advantage of issuing shares to buy more Bitcoin. When these stocks trade below the value of their holdings, the “issue stock, buy Bitcoin” flywheel effect cannot operate at scale.
Macroeconomic Linkages Amplify the Crisis
Reuters cites data from the London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG), showing that by 2025, the average correlation between Bitcoin and the S&P 500 approaches 0.5, up from about 0.29 in 2024. The report also indicates that the correlation with the Nasdaq 100 is close to 0.52, up from approximately 0.23 in 2024, suggesting many of the declines are linked to stock risk mechanisms.
In this context, interest rates are crucial as they determine market risk appetite. Bank of America expects two more rate cuts in June and July 2026, keeping the 2026 interest rate path a focal point for risk assets. It is this causal relationship that leads Checkonchain to describe the current situation as the most adverse since 2022.