# CryptoMarketStructureBill

The essence of the Crypto Market Structure Act is to define the boundaries of the "gray area."
The core significance of the Crypto Market Structure Act is not to restrict innovation but to clarify the boundaries for industries that have long operated in the gray area. Over the years, while crypto assets have developed rapidly, they have exhibited a "technology-first, regulation-lagging" state, with project teams, trading platforms, and investors all facing uncertainty. This environment, on one hand, promotes innovation; on the other hand, it also amplifies systemic risks. The problem the struc

With the implementation of regulations, the market faces short-term pressure, but in the long run, regulation is actually a filtering mechanism for projects. After the introduction of the Crypto Market Structure Act, the market's first reaction is often concern—rising compliance costs, limited room for innovation, and potential liquidity reduction. In an unregulated environment, bad coins tend to eliminate good coins, and short-term speculation becomes mixed with long-term development, leading to increased trust costs. The Structure Act raises the threshold, naturally eliminating some projects

Market Structure Act, reshaping the pricing logic of crypto assets
Once the structural legislation is gradually implemented, the way crypto assets are priced will also change. In the past, prices were largely driven by narratives, sentiment, and liquidity; in the future, compliance level, governance structure, and the quality of information disclosure will become new pricing factors.

This means that the market may experience significant differentiation: projects with clear business models, compliant pathways, and a genuine user base may receive more stable funding support; while assets driven