MPLX vs DYDX: Comparing Two Leading Decentralized Derivatives Exchanges in the Crypto Market

10-20-2025, 12:11:34 AM
Altcoins
Crypto Trading
DeFi
Futures Trading
Trading Fee
Article Rating : 3.8
half-star
0 ratings
This article delves into the investment comparison between Metaplex (MPLX) and dYdX (DYDX), two prominent decentralized derivatives exchanges in the crypto market. It examines historical price trends, supply mechanisms, and institutional adoption to assess their investment value. The piece addresses key questions about which token might be a preferential buy, offering insights for new, experienced, and institutional investors. It covers long-term vs short-term strategies, risk factors, technical and regulatory challenges, and market position, providing a comprehensive guide for those looking to invest in the multi-chain DEX landscape.
MPLX vs DYDX: Comparing Two Leading Decentralized Derivatives Exchanges in the Crypto Market

Introduction: MPLX vs DYDX Investment Comparison

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Metaplex (MPLX) vs dYdX (DYDX) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.

Metaplex (MPLX): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its role in creating and using digital assets on the Solana blockchain.

dYdX (DYDX): Established as a decentralized derivatives trading protocol, it has become known for providing margin trading based on ERC20 tokens.

This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between MPLX vs DYDX, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question most concerning to investors:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

  • 2022: MPLX reached its all-time high of $0.896784 on September 20, 2022.
  • 2023: DYDX hit its all-time low of $0.126201 on October 11, 2023.
  • Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, MPLX dropped from its peak of $0.896784 to a low of $0.02528374, while DYDX fell from its all-time high of $4.52 to $0.126201.

Current Market Situation (2025-10-20)

  • MPLX current price: $0.22344
  • DYDX current price: $0.3357
  • 24-hour trading volume: MPLX $340,529.69641 vs DYDX $679,626.361924
  • Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 29 (Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

price_image1 price_image2

II. Core Factors Affecting the Investment Value of MPLX vs DYDX

Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)

  • MPLX: MPLX has a maximum supply of 1 billion tokens. The initial circulating supply is 170 million tokens, with allocations for the team (20%), investors (20.2%), community (5%), future employees (7.5%), and the treasury (47.3%). Tokens allocated to team and investors have a 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff.
  • DYDX: DYDX has a total supply of 1 billion tokens. The token distribution includes 27.7% to investors, 15.3% to founders/employees, 7% to advisors/consultants, and 50% to the community treasury. The emission schedule spans 5 years with declining emission rates over time.
  • 📌 Historical pattern: Supply mechanisms with longer vesting periods and declining emissions tend to create more stable price action, though both tokens have significant portions allocated to insiders which could impact market dynamics when unlocks occur.

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

  • Institutional holdings: DYDX has attracted more institutional investors due to its established presence in the perpetual futures DEX market.
  • Enterprise adoption: DYDX has better integration with trading platforms and liquidity providers, while MPLX is positioning itself as a comprehensive multi-chain DEX solution.
  • Regulatory attitudes: Both face regulatory uncertainties in the US market. DYDX has transitioned to its v4 to address regulatory concerns, while MPLX's multi-chain approach may help it navigate different regulatory environments.

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

  • MPLX technical upgrades: MPLX offers a multi-chain DEX focused on capital efficiency with spot trading and perpetual futures. It uses the Cosmic VM execution environment and supports multiple blockchains including Solana, Aptos, and other EVM-compatible chains.
  • DYDX technical development: DYDX v4 launched on a Cosmos-based chain, offering perpetual futures trading with a focus on decentralization and low-latency trading. It features a high-performance matching engine and cross-margining capabilities.
  • Ecosystem comparison: DYDX has a more mature ecosystem specifically for perpetual futures trading, while MPLX aims to build a comprehensive multi-chain DEX ecosystem supporting both spot and perpetual trading across multiple blockchains.

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

  • Performance in inflationary environments: Both tokens are relatively new and have limited track records during different economic conditions.
  • Macroeconomic monetary policy: As trading platforms, both DYDX and MPLX may benefit from increased market volatility caused by changing interest rates and dollar strength, as this typically increases trading volumes.
  • Geopolitical factors: MPLX's multi-chain approach may provide better resilience against regional regulatory actions, while DYDX's established market position offers stability during uncertain market conditions.

III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: MPLX vs DYDX

Short-term Prediction (2025)

  • MPLX: Conservative $0.1765 - $0.2234 | Optimistic $0.2234 - $0.3285
  • DYDX: Conservative $0.1815 - $0.3362 | Optimistic $0.3362 - $0.4774

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

  • MPLX may enter a growth phase, with prices expected in the range of $0.2678 - $0.4105
  • DYDX may enter a bullish market, with prices expected in the range of $0.3329 - $0.6356
  • Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

  • MPLX: Base scenario $0.2660 - $0.4926 | Optimistic scenario $0.4926 - $0.6847
  • DYDX: Base scenario $0.3840 - $0.7246 | Optimistic scenario $0.7246 - $1.0289

View detailed price predictions for MPLX and DYDX

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

MPLX:

年份 预测最高价 预测平均价格 预测最低价 涨跌幅
2025 0.3284568 0.22344 0.1765176 0
2026 0.306302724 0.2759484 0.209720784 23
2027 0.41048704242 0.291125562 0.26783551704 30
2028 0.4806046340277 0.35080630221 0.2841531047901 57
2029 0.569516491322824 0.41570546811885 0.228638007465367 86
2030 0.684729261811963 0.492610979720837 0.266009929049252 120

DYDX:

年份 预测最高价 预测平均价格 预测最低价 涨跌幅
2025 0.477404 0.3362 0.181548 0
2026 0.60206696 0.406802 0.2644213 20
2027 0.6355874448 0.50443448 0.3329267568 49
2028 0.723913922248 0.5700109624 0.376207235184 69
2029 0.80223342848176 0.646962442324 0.36876859212468 92
2030 1.028929068272089 0.72459793540288 0.384036905763526 115

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: MPLX vs DYDX

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

  • MPLX: Suitable for investors focused on multi-chain DEX ecosystem potential and capital efficiency
  • DYDX: Suitable for investors interested in established perpetual futures trading platforms and decentralized derivatives

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

  • Conservative investors: MPLX: 30% vs DYDX: 70%
  • Aggressive investors: MPLX: 60% vs DYDX: 40%
  • Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-token combinations

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risks

  • MPLX: Less established market position, potential volatility due to multi-chain approach
  • DYDX: Concentration risk in perpetual futures market, competition from centralized exchanges

Technical Risks

  • MPLX: Scalability across multiple chains, network stability in multi-chain environment
  • DYDX: Potential security vulnerabilities in smart contracts, reliance on Cosmos ecosystem

Regulatory Risks

  • Global regulatory policies may affect both tokens differently, with DYDX potentially facing more scrutiny due to its focus on derivatives trading

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

  • MPLX advantages: Multi-chain approach, potential for broader ecosystem growth, capital efficiency focus
  • DYDX advantages: Established market position in perpetual futures, mature ecosystem, high-performance trading engine

✅ Investment Advice:

  • New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight preference for DYDX due to its established market position
  • Experienced investors: Explore opportunities in both tokens, with a focus on MPLX for its potential growth in multi-chain DEX ecosystem
  • Institutional investors: Consider a strategic allocation to both tokens, with DYDX for immediate exposure to decentralized derivatives and MPLX for long-term multi-chain DEX potential

⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice. None

VII. FAQ

Q1: What are the main differences between MPLX and DYDX? A: MPLX is a multi-chain DEX focused on capital efficiency, supporting spot and perpetual futures trading across multiple blockchains. DYDX is an established decentralized derivatives trading platform, primarily focused on perpetual futures trading on a Cosmos-based chain.

Q2: Which token has shown better price performance historically? A: Based on the provided data, MPLX reached its all-time high of $0.896784 in September 2022, while DYDX hit its all-time low of $0.126201 in October 2023. However, past performance does not guarantee future results.

Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of MPLX and DYDX compare? A: Both MPLX and DYDX have a maximum supply of 1 billion tokens. MPLX has a 4-year vesting schedule for team and investor allocations, while DYDX has a 5-year emission schedule with declining rates over time.

Q4: Which token is considered more suitable for long-term investment? A: MPLX may be more suitable for investors focused on multi-chain DEX ecosystem potential, while DYDX might appeal to those interested in established perpetual futures trading platforms.

Q5: What are the key risks associated with investing in MPLX and DYDX? A: MPLX faces risks related to its less established market position and potential scalability issues across multiple chains. DYDX risks include concentration in the perpetual futures market and potential regulatory scrutiny due to its focus on derivatives trading.

Q6: How do institutional adoptions differ between MPLX and DYDX? A: DYDX has attracted more institutional investors due to its established presence in the perpetual futures DEX market, while MPLX is positioning itself as a comprehensive multi-chain DEX solution.

Q7: What are the price predictions for MPLX and DYDX in 2030? A: For MPLX, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.2660 - $0.4926, with an optimistic scenario of $0.4926 - $0.6847. For DYDX, the base scenario predicts $0.3840 - $0.7246, with an optimistic scenario of $0.7246 - $1.0289.

* The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by Gate.
Related Articles
How does MYX compare to DYDX and GMX in the decentralized derivatives market?

How does MYX compare to DYDX and GMX in the decentralized derivatives market?

The article examines the competitive dynamics between MYX, dYdX, and GMX in the decentralized derivatives market. It highlights MYX's attractive features like low fees and high leverage, but notes its liquidity challenges compared to GMX. Despite price volatility and trust issues from past controversies, MYX is pursuing aggressive market expansion. Analysts suggest potential long-term price appreciation, hinging on MYX's technological innovations and market positioning. Gate lists MYX as a tradable asset, reflecting ongoing efforts for broader exchange adoption.
11-7-2025, 9:32:19 AM
What Are the Key Derivatives Market Signals for Aster in 2025?

What Are the Key Derivatives Market Signals for Aster in 2025?

The article explores Aster's significant rise in the decentralized exchange market since its March 2025 launch, highlighting its impressive $514 billion trading volume and strategic infrastructure. It provides a detailed analysis of ASTER's derivatives market signals, revealing cautious bullish sentiment through funding rates and long/short ratios. The text discusses Aster's dominance with 70% of the DeFi perpetual contracts market and its superior daily revenue performance. This article targets institutional and retail traders seeking insights into Aster's growth, strategic advantages, and position within the decentralized finance ecosystem. Key topics include trading volume, derivatives market signals, and competitive performance metrics.
12-4-2025, 11:56:23 AM
What Does “Liquidated” Actually Mean?

What Does “Liquidated” Actually Mean?

In crypto trading, getting liquidated means losing your margin due to heavy losses on a leveraged trade. Here’s what it means, how it happens, and how to avoid it.
7-9-2025, 9:45:48 AM
Gains Network: A Deep Dive into DeFi’s High-Leverage Synthetic Trading Frontier

Gains Network: A Deep Dive into DeFi’s High-Leverage Synthetic Trading Frontier

Discover the revolutionary world of decentralized trading with Gains Network's gTrade platform. Offering unprecedented 1000x leverage on synthetic assets, gTrade is reshaping the DeFi landscape. From zero-slippage trading to multi-collateral options, explore how this innovative platform is setting new standards in the digital asset market.
6-28-2025, 2:15:19 PM
Aster: Complete Guide to the Decentralized Perpetual Exchange

Aster: Complete Guide to the Decentralized Perpetual Exchange

Discover the revolutionary Aster, a decentralized perpetual exchange redefining crypto derivatives trading. Launched in 2025, Aster’s standout features include its innovative Trade & Earn program and high leverage opportunities. This platform addresses key DeFi concerns like MEV and introduces stock perpetuals, bridging traditional finance and DeFi. Offering unique trading strategies and robust risk management, Aster remains resilient amidst market challenges, bolstered by transparent practices and strategic advancements like its own Layer 1 blockchain. Traders seeking cutting-edge DeFi solutions can onboard effortlessly to the Aster ecosystem through Gate.
9-29-2025, 12:05:43 PM
What is MYX: Understanding the Innovative Cryptocurrency Exchange Platform

What is MYX: Understanding the Innovative Cryptocurrency Exchange Platform

This article provides a comprehensive overview of MYX Finance, an innovative non-custodial derivatives exchange launched in 2025 to address capital inefficiency and accessibility in the trading market. It highlights MYX's emergence as a significant player in DeFi, detailing its technical framework, market performance, and future prospects. The article covers MYX's decentralized operations, blockchain integrity, and secure transaction methods. It also examines MYX's market impact, applications within the ecosystem, community engagement, controversies, and future roadmap. Ideal for traders and investors seeking insights into decentralized finance and derivatives trading evolution.
9-30-2025, 7:39:59 AM
Recommended for You
Is Sweat Economy (SWEAT) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tokenomics, Market Potential, and Risk Factors

Is Sweat Economy (SWEAT) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Tokenomics, Market Potential, and Risk Factors

The article examines whether Sweat Economy (SWEAT) is a viable investment by analyzing tokenomics, market potential, and risk factors. It addresses issues such as SWEAT's price volatility, supply dynamics, and adoption levels. The structure covers the project's founding principles, current market analysis, blockchain infrastructure, investment strategies, and future price outlook. Key focus areas include the potential for growth within the move-to-earn segment and challenges like regulatory uncertainty and liquidity risk. This comprehensive analysis is tailored for cryptocurrency investors seeking insights into SWEAT's performance and long-term prospects.
12-21-2025, 5:26:12 PM
Is NuriTopia (NBLU) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Token Fundamentals, Market Potential, and Risk Factors for 2024

Is NuriTopia (NBLU) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Token Fundamentals, Market Potential, and Risk Factors for 2024

This article analyzes NuriTopia (NBLU) as an investment by evaluating its token fundamentals, market potential, and associated risks. It addresses key questions for potential investors, such as volatility, market trends, and investment viability. The structure includes a review of NBLU's price history, project overview, technical infrastructure, market liquidity, and community resources. The report also offers future price outlook and strategic recommendations for different investor profiles, focusing on risk management and investment strategies. This concise breakdown enables readers to quickly grasp NBLU's potential as a speculative asset in the metaverse sector.
12-21-2025, 5:25:03 PM
Is Sperax (SPA) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk, Potential, and Market Outlook in 2024

Is Sperax (SPA) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Risk, Potential, and Market Outlook in 2024

The article offers a comprehensive analysis of Sperax (SPA) as a cryptocurrency investment, examining its risk factors, potential growth, and market outlook in 2024. It discusses SPA's historical price trends, current market dynamics, and the project's technological foundation, focusing on its proprietary BDLS consensus protocol. The article aims to assist investors by highlighting SPA's volatility, liquidity challenges, and its role within the DeFi ecosystem. Key points include SPA's competitive environment, user adoption via Sperax Play, and its stablecoin product offerings. Suitable for investors seeking thorough insight into SPA's investment landscape.
12-21-2025, 5:24:50 PM
Is KernelDao (KERNEL) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Token Value, Market Potential, and Risk Factors

Is KernelDao (KERNEL) a good investment?: A Comprehensive Analysis of Token Value, Market Potential, and Risk Factors

The article provides a detailed analysis of KernelDAO (KERNEL) as a crypto investment, focusing on token value and market potential amidst significant historical price fluctuations. It studies KERNEL's price trends, current market status, and the robust ecosystem underlying KernelDAO. Addressing investor concerns, the piece analyzes risks such as supply dilution and market volatility, providing insights through market forecasts. Suitable for crypto investors seeking data-driven investment strategies, the article emphasizes strategic planning in a rapidly evolving restaking landscape. Key topics are supported by meticulous on-chain data and resource links, ensuring comprehensive coverage for informed decision-making.
12-21-2025, 5:23:47 PM
Is Orbiter Finance (OBT) a good investment?: Analyzing Risk, Potential Returns, and Market Positioning in 2024

Is Orbiter Finance (OBT) a good investment?: Analyzing Risk, Potential Returns, and Market Positioning in 2024

The article explores whether Orbiter Finance (OBT) is a viable investment by detailing its risk, potential returns, and market positioning as of 2024. It addresses investors' needs for understanding the historical price trends, current market status, and future projections of OBT, emphasizing its position in the cross-chain interoperability sector. The structure moves from an introduction to a deep dive into market analysis, project overview, and investment risks, followed by strategic recommendations. Keywords such as "OBT investment," "ZK technology," and "multi-chain ecosystem" are highlighted to enhance readability and SEO value.
12-21-2025, 5:22:22 PM
NIZA vs ARB: Comparing Two Emerging Blockchain Networks for DeFi and Web3 Applications

NIZA vs ARB: Comparing Two Emerging Blockchain Networks for DeFi and Web3 Applications

This article delves into the comparative analysis of two emerging blockchain networks, NIZA and ARB, focusing on their roles within DeFi and Web3 applications. It evaluates investment value, market performance, and technological infrastructure of each asset, addressing the key question: "Which is the better buy?" Targeted at investors and crypto enthusiasts, the article will examine historical price trends, market liquidity, risk factors, and supply mechanisms. Designed for quick scanning, it portrays the structural differences and strategic relevance of NIZA and ARB while emphasizing critical investment considerations. Keywords: NIZA vs ARB, DeFi, Web3, investment comparison, blockchain networks.
12-21-2025, 5:21:12 PM