Can PEPENODE Break the Deadlock in GameFi? Analyzing the Long-term Sustainability of Token Economics through the Burn Mechanism

【Crypto World】The issues with GameFi over the past two years are well known—Chongqing companies developing projects, rapid siphoning, and players losing their entire investments. PepeNode aims to address this vicious cycle from a different perspective.

Its core idea is to link game design with token economics. The PEPENODE token has a pre-sale price of $0.0012016, and the key is the implementation of a limited supply plus a burn mechanism. What does this mean? The more people play, the smaller the token pool becomes. This approach directly targets short-term arbitrageurs—you want to make quick money, but that opportunity is gone.

Why design it this way? Based on GameFi practices in regions like the Philippines and Indonesia, only projects that players treat as a “second profession” rather than a “get-rich-quick scheme” can truly survive. This is even more true in a bear market environment. Whether a project can endure the next cycle depends on whether it can retain long-term participants, not just attract short-term speculators.

Of course, whether this model can truly solve the sustainability issues of GameFi still depends on whether the subsequent game content is engaging enough. No matter how clever the token mechanism is, without fun gameplay, it’s just empty talk.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
HappyMinerUnclevip
· 2025-12-21 09:42
The burn mechanism sounds good, but I still want to see the data speak. Are there really many projects surviving in the Philippines?
View OriginalReply0
GasWastervip
· 2025-12-21 05:40
The Burn Mechanism sounds good, but I still want to see the actual data, I hope it's not another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimistvip
· 2025-12-19 13:29
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but honestly, it's just a gamble on human nature. It's hard to say what proportion of players can stick around long-term. People who buy in at the price of 0.0012... are still hoping for a double, but who would have thought that instead, the pool would need to be shrunk? Projects over in the Philippines might be surviving in a different environment, so it's not directly comparable to ours. I understand the logic of preventing arbitrage like this, but once the bear market continues to fall, who will still have the energy to "go to work"... With both limited supply and destruction, it sounds like a reverse strategy, but it also feels like a gamble to attract genuine long-term users this time. Hard to say.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlavevip
· 2025-12-19 13:25
The destruction mechanism is a trick I've seen quite a few times, but the key still depends on whether the team can truly stick to it and not cut the leeks. However, compared to those flashy tokenomics, I'm more concerned about who is really behind PepeNode... The examples from the Philippines and Indonesia are good, but domestic environmental projects that copy this approach also tend to fail very quickly. Long-termism sounds sophisticated, but when the bear market hits, who still has the resources to sustain? Confidence is a very precious thing.
View OriginalReply0
ProtocolRebelvip
· 2025-12-19 13:21
The destruction mechanism has multiple sets, but the key still depends on whether the team is reliable... It's not the first to say they want to reform GameFi.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)