The applicability of charges and amount determination disputes in virtual asset cases This case starts with a criminal judgment from a Shanghai court, involving employees in the traditional gaming industry who utilize their work permissions to modify backend data and resell game coins for profit. Although game coins and Crypto Assets are not in the same category, in the current judicial system where there is a lack of clear legislative guidance and established judgment standards regarding Web3, virtual assets, and Crypto Assets crimes, case handlers often use virtual property cases in the gaming industry as a basis for analogy to infer the legal characteristics of criminal cases in the Web3 field, the property nature of virtual assets, and the qualification paths of behaviors. Therefore, when handling criminal cases involving Crypto Assets, the value of lawyers researching criminal cases in the traditional gaming field lies in better understanding the thoughts and judgment methods of case handlers when dealing with virtual asset cases, thereby achieving a better understanding of both parties and formulating more targeted litigation strategies.