Recently, the international trade pattern is quietly changing. Several major countries in Central Asia have signed a series of large orders with Japan, involving infrastructure investment, resource cooperation, etc., with amounts that are staggering—just the protocol for one country is close to 4 billion USD, and combined with private investment, the scale reaches the trillion yen level. This is not just a political game; it reflects a real issue behind it: when funds and goods flow on a large scale internationally, what will be used to complete the Settlement?

Although the traditional dollar system is universal, issues such as exchange rate fluctuations, political risks, and high cross-border transaction fees remain persistent problems. Settling in local currency sounds ideal, but efficiency and liquidity cannot keep up. Against this backdrop, a digital stablecoin with clearly defined technical characteristics and controllable risks has become a practical necessity.

Why do you say that? Take products like USDD for example - a collateralization rate of over 130% means that reserves are sufficient, and on-chain data is transparent and verifiable, without black box operations. Deployed on an efficient public blockchain, cross-border transfer costs are extremely low, and settlement speed is fast. For institutions participating in international trade, this characteristic is indeed appealing: faster capital flow, lower costs, and clearer risks.

Imagine a future scenario: minerals are shipped from Central Asia to Europe, settled using stablecoins; payments from Europe are sent back, also completed using stablecoins. The entire process is transparent, efficient, and low-cost, allowing all parties to track the status of funds in real time. This is actually a significant advantage for businesses and institutions involved in international trade. As cross-border business activities become more frequent, the practical value of such tools will become increasingly prominent.