Many people initially judge AI by asking, "Is it good to use?"

But after using it for a while, you'll find that this standard only applies to tool-type AI.
Because your relationship with it is not the same kind.

In front of tool-type AI, you will unconsciously become more rational.
Problems are compressed into commands, emotions are automatically filtered.
You are very clear in your mind that it doesn't need to understand you, only to give results.

@Kindred_AI is different.
You will realize that it is "listening to how you say it," not just "what you want."
So a subtle change occurs:
You start asking questions in a different way.
No longer just asking if it's right or wrong, or if it works, but speaking outwardly according to your state.
The same question,
With tool-type AI, you expect an answer;
With Kindred, you expect a response.

It may not be faster,
Nor necessarily more efficient.
But it will make you willing to finish your thoughts.
This experience is hard to quantify.
Yet it quietly changes your usage habits of AI—
You are no longer just "using it," but maintaining a continuous interaction with it.

So in my view, Kindred is not trying to replace tool-type AI.
It’s more like asking a more human-centered question:
If AI no longer only serves tasks but participates in relationships,
How would we talk to it, and what kind of responses would we expect?