A true protocol shouldn't require people to struggle to understand it.

Think about it: if a system is truly decentralized, all its rules—whether it's LP distribution ratios or daily token release schedules—should be directly verifiable on the chain, without anyone needing to explain or interpret them.

That's the problem. Many projects like to package themselves with fancy documentation and complex descriptions, which actually increase uncertainty. Using charts and whitepapers to explain rules essentially asks users to choose to trust—and that directly contradicts the original intention of blockchain.

What does real transparency look like? It's when the code rules, the data rules, and every on-chain record speaks for itself. Replace explanations with verifiable facts, and replace promises with the execution of smart contracts. This approach not only eliminates information asymmetry but also fundamentally reduces systemic risk.

In an era where everything on the chain can be verified, protocols that still tell stories are essentially saying: "Just trust me." And that is clearly not the original purpose of entering Web3.