2025-12-31 11:23:52

2025 is the last day, wishing everyone a prosperous new year soon.

Recently, I took a close look at StandX's product logic and found that its approach is indeed different from most DeFi projects on the market.

What is the usual routine? — First generate hype, tell a story, and once the emotions are heated up, hurriedly add risk control models and trading mechanisms. This often leads to failures.

StandX does the opposite. It steadily builds the foundational infrastructure such as the stablecoin system, risk control framework, and trading structure first, ensuring the underlying logic is sound, and then gradually expands the narrative. DUSD, as the core stablecoin, has a rather thoughtful architecture.

This conservative approach may seem a bit restrained in today’s impatient market, but in the long run, it is indeed more risk-resistant.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

token_therapist

· 3h ago

Haha, this approach of deeply rooting in infrastructure is indeed a bit different and much more reliable than those projects that just make empty promises. Wait, can DUSD really hold up, or is it just another stablecoin story? Honestly, now I find projects focused on infrastructure somewhat rare; most are just hype-driven. By 2025, the winners will be those who don't go to zero, haha. Building such a complex architecture, could it backfire and become a trap for themselves? A conservative approach is indeed easily marginalized in this market, but longevity is what matters.

View OriginalReply0

HappyToBeDumped

· 3h ago

Oh wow, now that's the real deal. Most projects are really good at storytelling, only rushing to catch up after a dump. StandX flips the script by laying out the underlying logic first before bragging, which sounds pretty solid. But on the other hand, restraint has its benefits, though it can also lead to being forgotten by the market. It all depends on how they perform later on.

View OriginalReply0

ILCollector

· 3h ago

Haha, let's lay a solid foundation first and then tell stories. This approach is indeed refreshing. Much better than those who boast every day and then run away. --- DUSD, we need to see how it operates later. The biggest risk for stablecoins is still de-pegging. --- Honestly, being conservative isn't necessarily a bad thing. How are those aggressive projects in 2024 doing now? --- This idea is good, but I'm just worried that they'll start marketing wildly again later, and it will turn into another story. --- Being solid is good, but in the DeFi market, everyone loves rapid land grabbing. Does slow and steady really work here? --- Getting rich overnight? Don't joke. I just want my principal to stay alive. I'm used to unpredictable losses long ago, haha.

View OriginalReply0

OptionWhisperer

· 3h ago

Reverse operations are indeed rare, but in the highly competitive crypto environment, those who can resist temptation and lay a solid foundation probably won't have issues. I've seen many stories that start with a narrative, but in the end, they all turn into worthless tokens. The architecture of DUSD needs a close look; the threshold for stablecoins is indeed high. Getting rich in 2025 is a dream; not losing money and winning half the battle first is the way to go. StandX definitely feels a bit different this time, but I don't know how they will tell the story to gain traction later. Restraint traders tend to survive the longest in a bear market, and that's definitely true.

View OriginalReply0