Last night, something major happened in the traditional markets. The three major precious metals—gold, silver, and platinum—collectively plummeted after a significant meeting, with double-digit declines. This is no longer just a normal technical correction; it’s a signal from global big funds to the market. After so many years of a risk-averse trend, it may really be turning around.

Where did the money go? That’s an eternal question. Just look at the crypto market’s reaction—BTC surprisingly held its ground at the moment of the metals’ crash. This is no coincidence. Historical patterns tell us that whenever traditional safe-haven assets lose their appeal, liquidity will seek the next more aggressive destination. High-growth, high-volatility frontier assets often become targets, and the cryptocurrency ecosystem is just riding this wave.

Even more interesting is the timing. Early 2026 is very likely the turning point where global capital shifts from a "defensive strategy" to an "offensive strategy." To put it plainly, it’s moving from "preserving principal" to "pursuing growth." Once this shift truly begins, what scale of funds will flow into the crypto market?

But there’s a critical problem. When sovereign funds and multinational investment banks with hundreds of billions of dollars really step in, what do they need most? Trustworthy, transparent, and quantifiable data. Our ecosystem claims to be decentralized and ledger-transparent, but how much "hard data" can we actually provide to institutional investors for placing orders? On-chain data is visible, but is its credibility, completeness, and real-time nature sufficient? That’s the real bottleneck.

In other words, capital may be willing to come, but that doesn’t mean we’re fully prepared. This is the challenge we must address next.