2026 is becoming a policy watershed for the US cryptocurrency industry. Based on current information, this year not only consolidates several key legislative agendas but also serves as a critical window for administrative policy adjustments. The entire industry’s focus is on a core shift: from a past "enforcement-led" approach gradually evolving into a "legislation-led" regulatory model.



What does this mean? Simply put, the US aims to establish a comprehensive federal regulatory framework, rather than relying on agencies to negotiate and enforce on a case-by-case basis as in the past. The boundary between the SEC and CFTC’s responsibilities will also become clearer during this process, which is crucial for market stability expectations.

But there is a time pressure. If legislative breakthroughs are achieved in the first quarter, the likelihood of passing comprehensive bills throughout the year will significantly increase. Conversely, if caught in the vortex of election cycles, progress is likely to be delayed.

Even if legislation stalls temporarily, don’t be too pessimistic. The current administrative regulatory tone has already undergone a qualitative change — for example, the SEC has already adjusted its focus away from crypto assets in its annual review. More importantly, traditional financial institutions are continuously entering this space, creating a momentum that amplifies market calls for clear rules. In other words, regulatory clarification has become an irreversible trend.

So whether 2026 can be a turning point depends critically on whether legislative and political rhythms can be balanced.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
WenMoon42vip
· 4h ago
Can we break through in the first quarter? That's the real focus. Pre-legislation is much more moderate than enforcement; at least there's some reassurance. Wait, is it really a good thing that traditional finance is coming in? Or are we just going to get exploited again? This time is truly different; it feels like the momentum is really shifting. If by the second half of 2026 we're stuck at the election, then we'll have to wait again. I'm not afraid of legislative hurdles; I'm just worried about indefinite delays. It's so annoying.
View OriginalReply0
HalfIsEmptyvip
· 4h ago
Breaking the deadlock in the first quarter, or else we'll have to wait another four years. The pressure in this situation is a bit intense.
View OriginalReply0
CodeAuditQueenvip
· 4h ago
To be honest, this logical loophole is quite obvious. The SEC removing crypto from the review list is considered a "qualitative change"? It seems more like paving the way for subsequent heavy-handed actions, all old tricks.
View OriginalReply0
HappyMinerUnclevip
· 4h ago
If we can break the ice in the first quarter, I'll go all in. But honestly, whether this is reliable or not depends on how Washington folks mess around. --- The real signal is the entry of traditional finance, more solid than any legislation. --- Stuck? It's been stuck for a while. It all depends on whether they can get it done before the big election. --- Only when the regulatory framework is clear can the coin price truly rise. Right now, with this zigzag, who dares to hold heavy positions? --- I haven't seen any indication that the SEC is shifting focus. Can you share a link? --- What is 2026? At this pace, even 2030 might be out of reach.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)