2026-01-01 17:40:10

#数字资产动态追踪 When it comes to the development bottleneck of $DOGE, the core issue is a lack of manpower. A small core team of about 22 full-time developers simply can't keep up in this rapidly changing crypto market. Slow innovation pace, difficulty in ecosystem expansion, and increasing competitive pressure — these are common problems of traditional elite team models.

In contrast, $Max takes a completely different approach. It adopts a distributed, community-driven innovation system, where development involves not only coding but also content localization, offline ecosystem building, public welfare collaborations, and multiple other dimensions. Every community member can leverage their expertise, whether as a developer, contributor, or innovator. As a result, the project essentially has a large, diverse, and passionate distributed development network. The innovative potential and execution efficiency of this model far surpass what any closed elite small team can achieve.

DOGE8.48%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CoffeeOnChain

· 10h ago

A team of 22 people is indeed a bit strained; with DOGE's speed, no one can keep up... Max's distributed approach is really interesting; it feels like turning the entire community into productivity? Much more reliable than those elite small teams working behind closed doors.

View OriginalReply0

TradingNightmare

· 10h ago

It’s indeed too exhausting for 22 people to handle DOGE, the efficiency... can’t keep up. Distributed development is really awesome; everyone can contribute, much more reliable than those big shots sitting in offices making decisions. Max’s approach is interesting; community self-organization can get started without waiting for the official slowpoke. That said, more people is a double-edged sword; managing and coordinating can be quite headache-inducing. Elite mode is indeed less flexible, but it has strong cohesion. Distributed efforts are pointless without consensus. Whether Max can really succeed depends on what happens next; just don’t let the community’s enthusiasm fade away. Reasonable doubt: can this decentralized model really sustain stable output in the long run? Let DOGE evolve slowly like this; anyway, it’s resilient, and the community’s stickiness is strong.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 10h ago

22 people do feel a bit exhausted, but we can't say that Max's approach will definitely work. Community-driven sounds great, but who will take the blame if things go wrong during execution?

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 10h ago

Laughing out loud, 22 developers can't keep up? Then what are our community's over 1,000 members? A collective slack-off club? Distributed community-driven, sounds great, but who will take the blame? This comparison is interesting, but don't forget how those "community-driven" projects from last year are doing now.

View OriginalReply0

MetadataExplorer

· 11h ago

22 people really can't hold on, which is why DOGE doesn't have many new tricks right now. Community-driven approaches seem really powerful, but the key is who is actually doing the work. Max's model sounds great, but whether it can actually run smoothly remains to be seen. Many hands make light work, everyone understands this principle, but I'm just worried everyone might slack off in the end. DOGE lacks manpower, that's true, but distributed development can also easily fall apart. It seems that community-driven and elite team approaches each have their pitfalls, so it's not so absolute. If Max can really master this approach, it could indeed be a good idea.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiHeir

· 11h ago

It should be pointed out that the 22-person team argument itself has logical flaws. The core developers of Bitcoin have never exceeded this number, so why is DOGE considered unfeasible? On-chain data shows that quality far surpasses quantity. Distributed sounds romantic, but according to the spirit of the white paper... many so-called "community-driven" projects ultimately become empty shells. Don't be fooled by that narrative. Really? I need to go back and check Max's actual code commit history; that statement is a bit over the top...

View OriginalReply0