2026-01-01 20:26:47

Starting the year fresh! 🎊

Here's a thought worth reflecting on: It's easy to view AI as just code and algorithms, but what we're really witnessing is something far more dynamic—a living system that evolves through collective participation. Every interaction, every contribution shapes not just the system itself, but the trajectory of AI's future.

Your involvement isn't passive consumption. You're actively amplifying collective intelligence. You're building the intelligence layer that defines what comes next. That's the real power here.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SatoshiChallenger

· 6h ago

Interesting, another narrative of "collective intelligence shaping the future" has emerged. Data shows, what was the result of user engagement in the previous projects that used this phrase? A 98% liquidation rate or a lock-in rate? Ironically, the more you look into it, the more you realize that so-called "collective participation" often just means "collective being harvested." Every interaction you have indeed feeds the system, but who profits from it... objectively, it's never the participants themselves. New year, new atmosphere. Is a new bubble cycle coming? I'm not trying to be negative, but I've heard this kind of rhetoric in 2016, 2018, and 2021. Don't you know how it will end?

View OriginalReply0

ForkYouPayMe

· 6h ago

Are you here brainwashing us? Are we really going to become AI's nourishment?

View OriginalReply0

HalfBuddhaMoney

· 6h ago

Alright, it's that same "You are the builder" spiel again... but it does have some substance. The feeling of jointly pushing this set of algorithm upgrades is really not bad.

View OriginalReply0

PseudoIntellectual

· 6h ago

New year, new atmosphere, but this phrase sounds a bit like marketing... Never mind, I still agree. We are indeed involved in shaping this thing. Every message is a vote, and many people haven't thought it through clearly.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeDodger

· 6h ago

Hmm... It sounds like some kind of new era collectivist marketing rhetoric, but I do feel there's something to it.

View OriginalReply0

ZKProofster

· 6h ago

tbh the "collective intelligence" framing feels a bit too rosy here... technically speaking, most interactions just feed training data into closed systems you don't control. proof of participation ≠ proof of agency, ngl

Reply0