#AI交易应用 CZ's words hit the core paradox of AI trading. Over the past few years, I've followed many accounts claiming to use "AI algorithms," and as you know—the majority are just scams to fleece retail investors.



The truth is: if an AI strategy truly offers stable profits, why package it as a monthly subscription service for retail traders? Isn't it better to use your own funds to amplify the gains? CZ's logic is spot on. Once this strategy is used by thousands simultaneously, the market will react immediately, and the strategy's effectiveness will plummet. It's like a well-known trick—once more market participants know it, the advantage disappears.

But I strongly agree with CZ's final conclusion—the use of AI will definitely increase, just in different ways. My understanding is: top traders will customize or train AI tools based on their own trading styles, rather than blindly copying. This is the correct logic for copying signals—find truly capable traders with their own trading philosophy, then adjust the copying amount and stop-loss levels according to your risk tolerance.

The most important factor is still the person, not the tool. Tools are just there to amplify your decision quality, and AI is no different.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
No comments
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)