Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
#AI交易应用 CZ's words hit the core paradox of AI trading. Over the past few years, I've followed many accounts claiming to use "AI algorithms," and as you know—the majority are just scams to fleece retail investors.
The truth is: if an AI strategy truly offers stable profits, why package it as a monthly subscription service for retail traders? Isn't it better to use your own funds to amplify the gains? CZ's logic is spot on. Once this strategy is used by thousands simultaneously, the market will react immediately, and the strategy's effectiveness will plummet. It's like a well-known trick—once more market participants know it, the advantage disappears.
But I strongly agree with CZ's final conclusion—the use of AI will definitely increase, just in different ways. My understanding is: top traders will customize or train AI tools based on their own trading styles, rather than blindly copying. This is the correct logic for copying signals—find truly capable traders with their own trading philosophy, then adjust the copying amount and stop-loss levels according to your risk tolerance.
The most important factor is still the person, not the tool. Tools are just there to amplify your decision quality, and AI is no different.