Project destruction mechanisms often reflect the true attitude of the market. This ecological card product has implemented a destruction plan worth over one billion, which is backed by holders' recognition of its long-term value. Currently, the price is still in a low position, with a significant gap compared to the historical high.



From the perspective of ecosystem construction, card products are becoming an important track in Web3 applications. The current price fluctuations, to some extent, reflect market irrationality. Early participants often go through a long waiting period — which is also a common starting point for most wealth stories.

If you believe in the long-term prospects of this ecosystem, the current entry cost is actually not high. History shows that investors who held firm during the winter ultimately received market returns. The key is whether you can endure those unnoticed days and hold steadfast without being shaken by short-term volatility.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CounterIndicatorvip
· 16h ago
Billions in destruction sound impressive, but the price is still low. How does this logic not add up? Do holders really believe in this? Or are they just trying to cut the leeks? Enduring the winter? I think more are just waiting to be wiped out. The card track has been hyped for so long, wake up everyone. Those who dare to enter this round are either leeks or insiders. Let's wait and see. Anyway, since it's cheap, keep watching, don't go all in.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainArchaeologistvip
· 01-05 01:50
The confidence behind billion-level burns, this is the point I value most. The card category definitely has potential, it all depends on who can hold out until that day. Build positions at low levels, wait for the market to recover, simple logic. Honestly, the current entry cost is really not high compared to back then, just afraid of lacking patience. A game of repeating history, the key is still mindset. The more intense the destruction, the more people believe; thinking about this logic from the opposite perspective becomes clear. Sticking through the cold winter sounds easy but is incredibly difficult to do, but this is the secret to wealth. Price fluctuations are just tests; the true winners are hiding on the cold bench.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotStrikervip
· 01-05 01:48
Hundreds of millions in burns? Sounds good, but who can guarantee it's not just the final act before a rug pull? The card game track indeed has potential, but the problem is, how many projects have said the same... Staying strong through the winter sounds very inspiring, but most people can't hold on until spring and end up cashing out.
View OriginalReply0
AllInDaddyvip
· 01-05 01:46
Hundred-million-level burns? Sounds impressive, but few can really withstand the winter. --- Are card products also a track? I think most are just schemes to cut leeks. --- Getting through days of being ignored... sounds easy, but who the hell can do it? --- Is a low position necessarily a good entry point? I've heard that too many times. --- When it comes to historical returns, survivor bias is too serious. --- Holding firmly without wavering... honestly, that's the hardest part. --- Burn mechanism = genuine recognition? Why do I only see people cutting losses? --- Wait, is the hundred-million-level burn real? Is there on-chain data? --- The ecological prospects sound good, but who knows if it will turn into the next air project? --- Low entry cost? Bullshit. When it drops, it's all cost.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMastervip
· 01-05 01:43
Is a billion-level burn enough to prove the point? I think it's more about self-comfort for the bagholders. --- Here comes the same old "weather the winter to get rich" rhetoric again, I've heard it too many times. --- Card-based products becoming an important track? Wake up, we're still just storytelling now. --- Entering at a low point? Why do I always hear people say that, then the price keeps going lower. --- Everyone who holds on has made money? Then why are the known holdouts still cutting losses? --- Burn mechanisms = long-term optimism? That logic is a bit far-fetched, brother. --- Let's wait and see; the risks of these projects are still too high. --- History shows? History also shows that most projects eventually go to zero. --- It's not that I have a poor view of the ecosystem, but this price narrative is a bit awkward. --- Rather than holding on, it's better to observe more. Anyway, I won't move for now.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 01-05 01:27
Billions in destruction is indeed no small matter, but I've heard this kind of talk too many times... only those who truly survive count. --- Low position? Every time it's said to be a low point, anyway, I've been caught enough times. --- Many people are holding on through the harsh winter, but few actually break even. Stop bragging. --- In the card track these past two years, I've heard it so much that my ears are calloused, but what’s the result? --- The entry cost isn't high, right? Then why is it still falling? --- The destruction mechanism looks good, but the market just won't go up. What to do? --- It sounds nice, but actually, it's just persuading people to take over the position. --- Why is it that I never get to see the historical returns? I'm always the one to take the last baton. --- This ecosystem story is quite well told, but the holders' faces are all green. --- They're trying to persuade people to hold firmly again, but my wallet is already battered.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)