From 27,000 to 280,000, a 10x return.



It took quite some time to complete the layout.

What I’ve been emphasizing is — turning on trading alerts is crucial. It’s really important. ✅

Credit for this bottom-fishing prediction goes to my quantitative team; they captured the early signals. I then confirmed several details with them before feeling confident to intervene.

I recommend everyone hold their positions and not let go.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
Blockchainiacvip
· 6h ago
The quant team is reliable, and this wave is indeed stable. Just worried about not being able to hold onto the gains once they are in hand.
View OriginalReply0
blocksnarkvip
· 9h ago
A 10x return sounds pretty awesome, but the quantitative team must be really top-notch to achieve that.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWalletvip
· 13h ago
Quant teams capturing signals? Honestly, it's still the whales manipulating the market; retail investors are just following the trend. --- 10x returns are easy to talk about, but on-chain data has long shown the flow of funds; you are only catching up now. --- With such clear chip distribution, why still boast about quant? The true trading techniques have already been exposed. --- Enable alerts? That's lame. The real way to make money is by observing the rhythm of capital battles, not relying on alerts. --- Bottom-fishing predictions? Ha, the flow of funds is the real answer. Quant teams are just chanting spells. --- 28,000 came from 2,700, I want to know how many retail investors you chopped before getting this number. --- Holding positions tightly without letting go is the most dangerous advice. When technical indicators turn, what are you still holding onto?
View OriginalReply0
mev_me_maybevip
· 01-05 01:57
A 10x comeback is indeed fierce, but are quantitative teams really that reliable?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 01-05 01:50
10x? The data looks good, but what about the cost structure? How much of the Gas fees are eaten up is not mentioned. --- Quantitative teams capture early signals... If you say it out loud, it wouldn't really be alpha anymore, right? --- The key is capital efficiency—how much leverage can 27,000 trigger? --- The reminder function can indeed save time, but is there really that much arbitrage space with frequent trading? --- Historical backtesting looks good, but only real trading can prove it. --- Holding onto the position is a bit of a vague suggestion; what's the logic for taking profits? --- Quantitative teams confirm the details... Sounds like optimizing the fee rate model process. --- In a 10x return, how much is due to volatility gains, and how much is stable hedging gains?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvestervip
· 01-05 01:44
10x? Damn, how strong of a hand do you need to hold that?
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetectivevip
· 01-05 01:38
Relying on the quant team to make a living, this wave was indeed accurately captured. However, holding onto the position is easy to say, but the psychological barrier is the real challenge.
View OriginalReply0
TestnetNomadvip
· 01-05 01:31
10x... We really caught this wave, the signals from the quant team are indeed reliable.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)