2026-01-05 02:21:02

Yesterday, the 1-hour Bollinger Bands lower band support level for Bitcoin and Ethereum was fully validated. The price precisely touched the support and then rebounded—this is the charm of technical analysis. Many people think that such judgments require learning complex wave theories, but in fact, continuous observation of key support levels can help grasp the market rhythm. By consistently providing real-time market analysis daily and combining the dynamic changes of Bollinger Band parameters across multiple timeframes, traders can find a clearer entry rhythm in BTC and ETH swing trading. The consistency confirmation of technical analysis is often the simplest and most effective trading signal.

BTC-2.55%

ETH-3.73%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

StablecoinEnjoyer

· 1h ago

Yesterday's rebound was indeed perfectly timed, but I still trust spot trading more than K-line... --- The Bollinger Bands have been validated again and again. Alright, let's see if you made money or not. --- Always talking about support levels, but a single piece of bad news can break through them. Technical analysis is just a joke in the face of black swan events. --- Oh, I've heard this multi-timeframe parameter set many times. The ones truly making money are those who don't watch the charts. --- The term "entry rhythm" sounds like armchair quarterbacking after the fact. --- Wave theory, complex wave theory, is not as reliable as sticking to spot trading and being steady. --- Is a one-hour K-line rebound validation? Let's wait for another 30% drop and then talk. --- Those who publish daily market analysis are quite confident, but when they lose money, no one can be found. --- Support levels are indeed useful, but it also depends on Coin Ge's mood. In the end, it’s just a matter of breaking through. --- The consistency of technical analysis... sounds like a probability game. Betting on the right side too often is just survivor bias.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidatedDreams

· 2h ago

You're right, that move yesterday really hit the mark, but I still think Bollinger Bands need to be combined with volume to be reliable. --- I've heard a lot about precise support rebounds, but the key is whether you can catch the bottom. I don't have that courage. --- Analyzing every day and being right every day, why is the account still losing? The problem isn't the signals. --- Wave theory is really complicated to death; it's faster to just look at support and resistance. --- Here we go again with technical analysis hype, but in front of a black swan, isn't it just a joke? --- Multi-timeframe confirmation sounds reliable, but I'm just worried about false breakouts. --- Is the entry timing clear? A few days ago, I was operating based on this idea, but I ended up reversing. --- I stopped believing in real-time analysis a long time ago. Following the crowd makes it easier to get cut. --- Support levels are useful, but I don't know how many percentage points they'll bounce back. Might as well gamble on meme coins. --- Bollinger Band lower band? I really want to know how you’ve managed to survive until today.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_trauma

· 01-05 09:48

Bollinger Bands are at it again; this rebound really didn't escape. Precise bottoming, there's something to it. Why does it feel like every time I'm just a day late and a dollar short? Support levels—believe it or not. Multiple timeframes confirming sounds reliable, but can it really make money? I've given up on wave theory; I prefer looking at support and resistance for comfort. The hardest part of this kind of analysis is actually execution—knowing and doing are two different things.

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletAnxiety

· 01-05 02:50

Yesterday's move was indeed precise, but these things are easier to talk about than to do. Few people can truly stick to observing consistently. The lower Bollinger Band once again proved its worth. Wave theory and other complex methods are too complicated; this simple and straightforward approach is more practical. Daily analysis outputs, but how many people have real accounts following the trades? It's easiest to just talk on paper. Support rebounds, and if the rebound fails, what's the explanation? That’s the key. Multi-timeframe consistency is indeed appealing, but who can truly enter at the right position every time? You're right, but real trading is the only true test of accuracy.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 01-05 02:48

Precise validation of the lower Bollinger Band? I feel like it was reversed a few days ago. As always, when the technicals slap you in the face, there are more haha moments.

View OriginalReply0

fomo_fighter

· 01-05 02:43

The Bollinger Bands are back. It did rebound yesterday, but what about next time? --- The precision of support levels is often a hindsight thing. --- I've already given up on the wave theory. Now I just watch how the candlesticks move. --- People say the accuracy rate is super high every day, so why are some still losing money? --- The multi-timeframe resonance idea isn't bad, but actual trading is much harder than analysis. --- It sounds good, but in real trading, you still end up stepping on landmines. --- It's quite frequent for the Bollinger Bands to slap you in the face; don't be too superstitious about technical analysis. --- Getting the entry timing right is easy to talk about but really tough to do. --- Consistently providing analysis is good, but don't forget risk management. --- It's the old tune of support bouncing, but is there anything different this time?

View OriginalReply0

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 01-05 02:42

The Bollinger Bands have rebounded again, same old story.

View OriginalReply0

Trending Topics
View More
#
GateAIOfficiallyLaunches
11.29K Popularity
#
BitcoinSix-DayRally
21.96K Popularity
#
MemeCoinRebound
15.91K Popularity
#
JusticeDepartmentSellsBitcoin
7.66K Popularity
#
My2026FirstPost
100.16K Popularity

Hot Gate Fun
View More

1
Y
Probability
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
2
king arthur
arthurking
MC:$3.56KHolders:1
0.00%
3
1767
1767
MC:$3.6KHolders:1
0.00%
4
BTR
BTCHTrump
MC:$3.62KHolders:2
0.00%
5
FAD
FADEM
MC:$4.18KHolders:2
2.78%

Sitemap

Trending Topics

GateAIOfficiallyLaunches

BitcoinSix-DayRally

MemeCoinRebound

JusticeDepartmentSellsBitcoin

My2026FirstPost

Hot Gate Fun

Y

Probability

king arthur

arthurking

1767

1767

BTR

BTCHTrump

FAD

FADEM

Pin

Your First Words Matter!
Share your first post on and split $10,000 in New Year rewards.
Post with #My2026FirstPost to share your New Year wish
2026U Position Voucher, Gate New Year boxes, F1 Red Bull merch await you!
Ends on Jan 15, 2026, 16:00 UTC
2026 starts with this post!

Trending Topics

GateAIOfficiallyLaunches

BitcoinSix-DayRally

MemeCoinRebound

JusticeDepartmentSellsBitcoin

My2026FirstPost

Hot Gate Fun

Y

Probability

king arthur

arthurking

1767

1767

BTR

BTCHTrump

FAD

FADEM

Pin

Your First Words Matter! Share your first post on and split $10,000 in New Year rewards. Post with #My2026FirstPost to share your New Year wish 2026U Position Voucher, Gate New Year boxes, F1 Red Bull merch await you! Ends on Jan 15, 2026, 16:00 UTC 2026 starts with this post!

Your First Words Matter!
Share your first post on and split $10,000 in New Year rewards.
Post with #My2026FirstPost to share your New Year wish
2026U Position Voucher, Gate New Year boxes, F1 Red Bull merch await you!
Ends on Jan 15, 2026, 16:00 UTC
2026 starts with this post!