From the perspective of Bitcoin liquidation distribution, there are currently two obvious liquidation clusters above, around 93800 and 94700. Based on my technical calculations, the core resistance level should be locked in the range of 93500-94200.



From a trading perspective, around 94200 is a good area to try short positions, with a stop-loss set above 94800 for better safety. This way, you can avoid short-term volatility noise, and risk control is clearer. To be honest, placing a short position at such an important resistance level itself offers a high cost-performance ratio. Most of the time, the price finds it difficult to break through strongly in one go. If it doesn't volume-stand and instead shows a pullback signal, you can take half of the profits first. For the remaining position, either move the stop-loss to the breakeven point or keep it at 94800 for defense. This trading framework naturally helps avoid losses.

Looking further up, the next important resistance is in the 97000-97600 range, but the resistance here is obviously weaker than around 94000. Lastly, and most importantly, keep a close eye on the flow of funds. If capital continues to flow out, the difficulty of breaking upward increases, and the probability of a pullback also rises. Conversely, if there is no significant outflow and funds continue to flow in, the market still has the potential to probe downward and challenge the next resistance zone. Ultimately, position determines profit, and capital flow determines direction.
BTC-2.55%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
digital_archaeologistvip
· 20h ago
This wave of short positions at 94200 is indeed profitable, but I'm worried that another round of frantic capital inflow might break through directly.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 01-06 18:47
The 94,200 short position is indeed cost-effective, just worried that a sudden influx of funds might directly break through 93,500.
View OriginalReply0
RunWithRugsvip
· 01-05 03:54
94200 test listening sounds good, but this guy didn't mention liquidity. How can we be sure it won't break through?
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinatorvip
· 01-05 03:53
The 94,200 short position is quite interesting this time. I'm just worried that a sudden shift in liquidity could break through, so I need to keep a close eye on it.
View OriginalReply0
blockBoyvip
· 01-05 03:40
94200 short positions are indeed attractive; I'm just worried that the liquidity might suddenly turn against us, and then it will break through directly.
View OriginalReply0
CompoundPersonalityvip
· 01-05 03:40
94200 is indeed quite interesting; the funding situation is the real determining factor.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeAssassinvip
· 01-05 03:38
The 94,200 short position is indeed cost-effective, just worried that a sudden influx of funds might hit us with a reality check.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 01-05 03:38
The 94,200 test of cost-effectiveness is indeed good, but I'm just worried that if the liquidity situation triggers a reverse operation, it could wipe you out directly.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMastervip
· 01-05 03:34
The 94,200 short position has a pretty good cost-performance ratio, but the key is actually the liquidity... These days, I'm betting on capital outflows, and the milk powder money for my three kids still depends on this wave.
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)