In the long run, this project's token design is more reasonable. The core reason is that 10% of the token supply is held by the project team, and all transaction fees have been readjusted in the distribution mechanism. In contrast, another project lacks this advantage—main developers do not have substantial equity or利益绑定 in the project itself. Without sufficient economic incentives and skin in the game, it is difficult to sustain long-term project enthusiasm and development momentum. From this perspective, the token economics design of the former is obviously more sustainable, which is also an important indicator for assessing the long-term potential of a crypto project.