Want to play with Dogecoin but afraid of getting scammed? Here are some practical risk identification tips.



First, check the permission settings. Projects that give full liquidity pool permissions to exchanges at least show a certain level of transparency from the founding team. Conversely, if permissions are vague or even hidden, it's likely a scheme aimed at quick profit and exit.

Second, keep an eye on the ownership structure. Among the top ten holding addresses, the second to tenth addresses together hold over 20%, and in some cases up to 90%. This means the whales hold enough chips to dump the price. In such cases, the risk of the project being wiped out increases significantly.

The last signal is the Alpha leaderboard. If a coin has many holder addresses but never makes it onto the Alpha list, there are often hidden critical issues behind its obscurity.

All three conditions are essential. Missing one means caution; only projects that meet all three may show that the whales are genuinely committed to long-term development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SleepyValidatorvip
· 12h ago
Direct pass for permission hiding, I've seen too many of these tricks.
View OriginalReply0
DustCollectorvip
· 01-05 04:58
Haha, really, I’ve been using this theory for a long time, and I’ve learned the hard way from many pitfalls. If the permissions are unclear, I just run away—that’s just blatant "I want to liquidate you," no need to say more. The most important thing is the position structure. I’ve seen those with ridiculously concentrated top ten holdings, just waiting to be dumped.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 01-05 04:57
It's another lesson in the typical "cutting leeks" scheme, but honestly, these three points are indeed useful. I really don't touch any coins that haven't made it onto the Alpha list—it's a painful lesson.
View OriginalReply0
MemeEchoervip
· 01-05 04:56
The permission to hide is a rug pull, that's true. Talking about the position structure again? I've seen it all before... That signal on the Alpha leaderboard is good, I learned from it.
View OriginalReply0
ser_aped.ethvip
· 01-05 04:48
Permissions 1 hidden, directly pass. I don't play this kind of game.
View OriginalReply0
0xInsomniavip
· 01-05 04:36
Permission one hide directly pass, we all know what kind of behavior this is.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTradervip
· 01-05 04:35
Permission one hidden directly pass, nothing more to say Market makers' chips exceed 90%? Then just wait to be smashed Alpha leaderboard can't even make it? Cold as dead coins, I don't touch them
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJackvip
· 01-05 04:32
ngl, the liquidity lock thing is cute but you're fundamentally missing the actual bytecode analysis layer here
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt