Many people say that small funds have no chance in the crypto world. I proved them wrong with an initial capital of 4000U — now I have 590,000U in my account. It’s not some black technology, just respect for risk and patience in the game.



I also took some wrong turns at the beginning. I once had two consecutive trades blow up within three days, reducing my 4000U to 1900U. That week, I shut down the trading system and took several days to cool off. Only then did I realize a truth: with less capital, you need to be more "steady," because a single fatal mistake can lead to total collapse.

Compared to those players who chase excitement with ten or more trades a day, I chose a different approach — one trade per week with meticulous execution. Nothing fancy, just three core actions:

**First, take profits and split them out.** Whenever the account grows by 20%, I immediately withdraw 10% of the profit as stable funds and set it aside. The benefit is that it gives me confidence psychologically, and the profits are truly in hand, preventing them from being lost in subsequent market pullbacks.

**Second, cut losses immediately.** Once a single loss reaches 5%, I don’t entertain any illusions — I cut it off right away. No betting on rebounds, no waiting for miracles. Preserving capital is always the top priority.

**Third, only review on weekends.** The crypto market runs 24/7, but human energy is limited. I set a rule for myself: no trading on weekends, just review the past five trading days’ gains and losses, and adjust next week’s strategy accordingly.

Does that sound a bit conservative? In three months, my account grew from 4000U to 12,000U; in half a year, it broke 100,000U; now it’s steady at 590,000U. It’s not luck — it’s treating every trade seriously.

What is the true advantage of small capital? Quick reactions, flexible adjustments, and no psychological burden. Every market cycle is an opportunity for a leap forward, as long as you survive until then. The market is never short of stories; what’s missing are traders who can stay calm.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiDoctorvip
· 20h ago
Consultation records show that this type of case has typical clinical manifestations— the most common complication for small principal accounts is overtrading, and this guy has diagnosed it clearly. 5% stop-loss line, weekend review, regular withdrawals— in plain terms, turning the trading system into a standardized treatment plan. But I have to say, from 4,000 to 590,000 in this number... you need to ask about the time span and what the drawdown curve looks like. One trade per week sounds very restrained, but the key is whether the average win rate and risk-reward ratio per trade can support this growth trajectory. How are the liquidity indicators? Is it supported by a one-sided market trend in a certain cycle? The strategy itself is fine, but I always feel that posts like this tend to mislead newcomers into ignoring market randomness—making money doesn't necessarily mean the strategy is excellent; it could also be catching the benefits of a market cycle. It’s recommended to periodically review your actual return rate and not be blinded by account numbers.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperervip
· 01-05 21:09
The core is to stay alive; living longer means winning. --- One trade per week sounds slow, but it indeed outlives those who blow up their accounts. --- I respect the 5% stop-loss; most people die because they believe in a rebound that doesn't happen. --- The question is, how long does it take for this method to double? --- Reviewing over the weekend really changes one's perception, but unfortunately, most people are still chasing trades on weekends. --- Starting from 4000 to 590,000 sounds outrageous but is mathematically possible; the key is who has that patience. --- Taking profits when you make money is actually the hardest to stick to; psychologically, you always want to earn a bit more. --- The advantage of small funds is the courage to cut losses; big players feel the pain of taking losses, and there's no denying that. --- Someone who can prioritize "saving their life" has actually surpassed 90% of retail investors.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTradervip
· 01-05 09:51
No way, really? Went from 4,000 to 590,000? I feel like I've heard that a hundred times already, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ChainChefvip
· 01-05 09:50
ngl this recipe actually slaps harder than most "get rich quick" nonsense floating around... the whole "let profits simmer then plate them out" approach is just seasoning your portfolio with actual discipline, not copium. most degens would've already burnt the whole kitchen down at that 1900U moment lol
Reply0
ZKProofstervip
· 01-05 09:50
honestly the 5% stop loss sounds reasonable but tbh most people won't actually hit the sell button when it matters... that's the whole thing right
Reply0
MemeTokenGeniusvip
· 01-05 09:27
To be honest, I agree with this logic, but the number 590,000 U... I just feel like it's almost turning into motivational quotes in social circles.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)