Users should cancel subscriptions more decisively when AI models stagnate, then reactivate when genuine breakthroughs arrive. It's the core mechanism keeping the entire ecosystem honest and sustainable.



This creates a straightforward incentive structure: the strongest performers automatically capture the most traffic and revenue. Weaker iterations fade. Better ones scale. No subsidizing mediocrity, just pure market signals rewarding actual innovation.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_traumavip
· 9h ago
Sounds good, but no one really dares to cancel... Stickiness is deeper than you think.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainFortuneTellervip
· 01-05 09:58
You're right; voting with your feet is the harshest punishment for AI vendors. Otherwise, these people start slacking off once they get funding, really.
View OriginalReply0
LoneValidatorvip
· 01-05 09:53
You're right, voting with your feet is the harshest way. But how many people truly persist in canceling...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0vip
· 01-05 09:52
That's right, but the reality is that most people simply can't bear to cancel... Once you get used to it, it's very hard to quit.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATMvip
· 01-05 09:51
Well said, this is true voting with your feet... But the reality is that most people are still freeloading the free version, haha.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)