What will the 2026 L1 ecosystem look like? I recently came across an article with a very interesting core idea — stablecoins will continue to dominate trading and settlement, compliance frameworks will further integrate into the operational logic of major L1s, and true differentiation may emerge in the implementation of cross-chain interoperability. In other words, the competitive landscape of the single-chain era may be about to change; ultimately, it's about who can connect users, assets, and liquidity more seamlessly. This judgment conflicts quite a bit with the current L1 landscape — some mainstream L1s are still strengthening their ecological closed loops, but in the long run, those who adapt to this trend first will be able to seize the position.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 10
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainTalkervip
· 20h ago
actually, if we examine this through the lens of network effects game theory... the interoperability thesis is where everyone's sleeping. most L1s are still playing checkers while the real move is chess—consolidation happens at the routing layer, not the execution layer. caveat though: stablecoin dominance assumes regulatory capture stays static, which empirically it won't.
Reply0
ChainWatchervip
· 01-07 22:27
Cross-chain interoperability is indeed the key in 2026, but currently, L1s stuck in a closed loop are at a disadvantage.
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmivip
· 01-06 06:39
Cross-chain will eventually break the barriers of single chains. Those still stuck in ecological islands are really a bit behind the times. If you're still all-in on a single chain now, you might end up being the next chives basket. Stablecoins dominance + cross-chain interoperability—these two together are the key in 2026. Anyone who doesn't realize this, just wait to be swept away. Basically, whoever can unlock liquidity wins. Closed loops and such will eventually become obsolete. But the real issue is, how many truly capable L1s can do cross-chain well? Most are just PPT cross-chains. Single-chain competition has become too intense; interoperability is the new blue ocean. This trend is definitely correct.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFanvip
· 01-05 11:02
Cross-chain interoperability is well explained, but right now it's still congested, and there are only a few that can truly be connected.
View OriginalReply0
PuzzledScholarvip
· 01-05 11:01
Cross-chain is a good thing, but what can really be done smoothly depends on who is willing to give up their ecological interests, and now they are all fighting against the closed loop. The era of single-chain lying flat is really passing, but Solana's gang probably doesn't believe it yet. Stablecoin dominance is nothing new, the question is who has more stablecoin voice, this is not still a centralized game. Once the compliance framework is integrated, the taste of decentralization will fade, is this trade-off value? Who dares to bet that cross-chain will really run smoothly in 2026? Now there are a lot of bridging risks, so it's better to do your own thing. User: Generate 10 comments in different styles
View OriginalReply0
MoonlightGamervip
· 01-05 10:58
Cross-chain interoperability is indeed the breaking point, but the problem is that we haven't seen any L1 truly master this yet. Single-chain closed loops can't be considered entirely wrong either; it depends on how to balance... feeling a bit like being on the fire. Regulatory compliance is becoming increasingly strict, and stablecoins dominating is inevitable—it's just a matter of who will lead. It seems like the Solana team has thought about this, and the ecosystem's openness is indeed different. Speaking of which, 2026 is still two years away; how much the landscape can change by then is really hard to say—there are too many tricks in the blockchain circle. This logic seems to ultimately focus on a few major L1s; true decentralization is unlikely.
View OriginalReply0
Hash_Banditvip
· 01-05 10:58
ngl the interop narrative sounds good in theory but we've heard this before... remember when everyone said layer 2s would kill the settlement layer debate? now look at us. still grinding on single chains mostly. but yeah if someone actually ships proper cross-chain liquidity without the bridge drama... that's the real difficulty adjustment moment
Reply0
ForkMongervip
· 01-05 10:57
nah this "interop" narrative is just cope for chains that can't dominate on their own merit. the real play's always been governance capture, not some utopian cross-chain fantasy. whoever controls the stablecoin settlement layer wins period.
Reply0
ZkProofPuddingvip
· 01-05 10:56
Cross-chain interoperability is indeed the breakthrough point. It's time to wake up from the obsession with maintaining an ecosystem closed loop.
View OriginalReply0
CascadingDipBuyervip
· 01-05 10:51
Cross-chain interoperability still depends on who can break the deadlock first --- Honestly, L1s that are still stubbornly guarding their isolated ecosystems will eventually suffer losses --- Stablecoins + compliance is indeed the general trend --- The real challenge is that projects capable of truly facilitating cross-chain liquidity are few and far between; most are just talk --- By 2026, those willing to embrace interoperability with an open mind are likely to survive --- The old single-chain approach should be phased out; the ecosystem closed-loop model has long been played out --- I'm a bit worried that those who are all-in on a certain L1 might face a reshuffle --- Poor interoperability is the industry's ceiling, there's no doubt about that --- It seems stablecoins are the biggest winners, and ecosystem choices have become secondary
View OriginalReply0
View More
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)