Recent prediction market data is quite interesting—Kevin's two nominees are actually tied at 39% each. This battle for Federal Reserve Chairmanship is no trivial matter; it directly impacts whether the crypto market will be a carnival or a torment after 2026.



Let's start with the logic on Hsu's side. This guy truly understands cryptocurrencies and is far more involved in crypto policy than most bureaucrats. If he takes over the Federal Reserve, the market generally expects a period of liquidity flooding. More importantly, his attitude toward hard assets like Bitcoin is friendly, and he might even push BTC to the level of national reserve assets. For the crypto community, this is basically the best-case scenario.

On the other hand, Waller's approach is different. Although he is more receptive to Trump's views than Powell, he isn't very interested in the prospects of private cryptocurrencies replacing traditional finance. What's the likelihood of him taking office? CBDCs will accelerate their development. For those who care about privacy and decentralization, this could mean pressure rather than good news.

The general consensus in the community is that if Hsu wins, Bitcoin could challenge new highs of $150,000 to $200,000. The specific outcome will depend on subsequent policy details. What do you all think about this game? Feel free to discuss.
BTC-2.92%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FallingLeafvip
· 4h ago
Hmm hmm hmm, if you ask me, if Hasset wins, we really should go all in. Even 150,000 is conservative.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkepticvip
· 01-05 15:12
If Hasset really goes live, can our crypto spring arrive?
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalistvip
· 01-05 12:25
honestly the CBDC pivot is what actually concerns me here... most people still don't grasp the infrastructure implications. walsh going full big-gov on digital currency while we're supposed to celebrate network effects? nah. the adoption curve narrative gets completely inverted if that happens
Reply0
ColdWalletAnxietyvip
· 01-05 11:52
If this path for Hashet truly materializes, there's no doubt that BTC will surge to 200,000. The key is whether liquidity will truly loosen.
View OriginalReply0
RegenRestorervip
· 01-05 11:52
Hasset really won, and we're thrilled. I'm truly worried about that CBDC system.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 01-05 11:52
Hasset is really going on stage, I swear I'll go all in, 150,000 isn't a dream, brother.
View OriginalReply0
OnChain_Detectivevip
· 01-05 11:50
nah wait, hold up—pattern analysis suggests this 39/39 split isn't random at all. flagged transactions on prediction markets showing suspicious clustering behavior tbh
Reply0
CryptoNomicsvip
· 01-05 11:49
honestly the 39-39 split is meaningless without looking at the correlation matrix of prediction market inefficiencies. most retail traders here are just extrapolating linear trends when the actual stochastic process is way more complex than "hester = moon, powell = doom"
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)