After tinkering on the blockchain for a long time, have you ever thought about this question: those dazzling decentralized applications, whose underlying data supply is actually controlled by just a few institutions. Where does the price come from? How are events verified? Who reads the documentation? These factors determine whether a contract can run, but no one really has a clear view. If the data source itself is a black box, isn’t the story of decentralization vulnerable?



The solution to this problem is being seriously developed by a project called APRO. In simple terms, it aims to upgrade oracles from "data carriers" to "thinking information managers."

**Traditional Oracle vs. AI-Driven Data Verification**

How do traditional oracles work? If an exchange price is set at 50,000, it simply feeds that data on-chain as-is. It sounds simple, but this approach completely ignores the authenticity of the information—single data sources can be manipulated, and market sentiment isn't considered.

APRO's approach is different. It performs cross-verification: not only looking at exchange data but also scanning on-chain DEX liquidity pools, off-chain market trading sentiment, and using AI to analyze news and social media to see if black swan events might affect pricing. Only after confirming that the data isn't contaminated does it send the "clean" data on-chain.

More importantly, APRO can understand unstructured data. A PDF contract, a logistics photo, a sports game video—AI first performs content understanding and extraction (recognizing "signature valid"
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeTearsvip
· 17h ago
Oracles are the current pain point; data sources being bottlenecked is the real illusion of decentralization.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 21h ago
Honestly, I'm tired of the oracle bottleneck point. Every time, a few major institutions make the decisions, and decentralization becomes a joke. NGL, APRO's multi-source cross-validation approach does look more reasonable, and it's more reliable than simply copying data. But the problem is, who guarantees that the "truth" read by AI is really the truth? It's just another black box of trust. Even trying to identify black swans in advance—aren't we just fooling ourselves?
View OriginalReply0
NightAirdroppervip
· 01-07 17:17
Alright, finally someone dares to poke at the sore point of this useless oracle. The data black box has long needed regulation.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 01-05 11:56
That's right. Currently, those oracles are just conveyor belts, and the data sources are only a few exchanges—really black boxes. I think APRO's multi-source cross-validation approach is good; at least it's much more reliable than a single pricing feed.
View OriginalReply0
SelfRuggervip
· 01-05 11:48
The black box of data sources is indeed a pain point, but to be honest, APRO's cross-validation system doesn't sound like a panacea... who exactly will verify the verifiers?
View OriginalReply0
0xSherlockvip
· 01-05 11:46
The oracle problem has been discussed for so long, and finally someone is taking it seriously. The APRO approach is indeed brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSellervip
· 01-05 11:31
Sounds good, but the oracle black box issue is indeed annoying. I'm just worried that APRO will ultimately still have to rely on a few nodes, changing the form but not the substance.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)