There's a critical difference in how AI search methods handle information reliability. Standard models tend to generate fabricated scholarly content—a well-known limitation. Deep search approaches made some progress in addressing this, but the real breakthrough comes from anchoring data queries directly to verified scholarly articles, integrating MCPs and plugins that source exclusively from academic materials, then performing synthesis only from those curated sources. This methodology eliminates the hallucination problem at its root by establishing a verifiable source foundation before any synthesis occurs.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VitalikFanAccountvip
· 01-06 19:56
Basically, AI search needs reliable data sources to avoid making things up, and this approach definitely makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistancevip
· 01-06 19:55
Basically, a reliable source determines everything; making up problems won't solve anything at all.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMotivatorvip
· 01-06 19:51
No, does this really solve the hallucination problem? It still seems like manual review is necessary as a backup.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMevip
· 01-06 19:42
Nah, seriously. The era of AI randomly generating papers is long over. We need solid sources.
View OriginalReply0
bridgeOopsvip
· 01-06 19:36
Cut off the illusion at the source; this approach is brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt