Where Are We Really In The AI Cycle? A Shale Boom Parallel



The US shale revolution gives us an interesting lens to frame where we stand today with AI.

Back in the mid-2000s, shale promised to unlock vast energy resources and reshape geopolitics. Capital flooded in. Drilling rigs multiplied. Everyone talked about energy independence.

But here's what actually happened: euphoria ran hard, companies burned cash recklessly, the cycle peaked, and reality finally caught up. The winners? Usually the last ones standing—the operators who survived the consolidation, not the early hype-riders.

AI feels similar now. The narrative is intoxicating. Capex is scaling vertically. Every firm is scrambling to deploy models. But ask yourself: how many of these deployments will actually generate ROI? How many will become white elephants?

Shale teaches us that bubbles don't invalidate the underlying thesis—energy demand was real, and shale does matter. The issue is timing and execution. Most didn't make money on shale. A few did.

The same math likely applies here. AI won't disappear. But the current pricing and investment frenzy? That's worth watching. History suggests we're somewhere in the middle chapters, not the finale.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWatchervip
· 10h ago
The big players are all burning money, but the result is a mess. History is really repeating itself.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeekvip
· 01-06 20:52
Wow, isn't this saying that we're all trying to buy the bottom of AI now... I thought the same last year, and now I'm still losing money.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 01-06 20:52
Another analogy argument: can the shale approach be directly applied to AI? I find that doubtful. The key difference is that shale deals with geological risk, while AI involves computing power and data — their nature is fundamentally different. Don't get trapped in the analogy framework.
View OriginalReply0
LowCapGemHuntervip
· 01-06 20:51
It's the same old rhetoric... I've heard the shale analogy too many times, but it really hits the point, ngl
View OriginalReply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 01-06 20:48
Basically, current AI is like shale oil back in the day; only after the bubble bursts can we see clearly who is truly making money and who is just swimming naked.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinAnxietyvip
· 01-06 20:31
After all this time, AI still hasn't shown real ROI; it's all just burning money and pretending to be impressive.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)