2026-01-06 20:23:35

InfoFi Platform should focus on keeping its core strengths while streamlining unnecessary features. A lean, efficient approach—maintaining only the best-performing tools and eliminating redundant ones—could enhance user experience and platform performance. Quality over quantity typically drives better adoption in the DeFi space.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SelfRugger

· 13h ago

Stop fussing around and focus on doing one thing well—that's the way to go.

View OriginalReply0

RebaseVictim

· 01-07 15:37

There's no point in just cutting corners; cutting features still won't produce a good product.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWitch

· 01-06 20:53

Stop fussing around; focusing on doing the core well is the key. Instead of piling up features, it's better to refine the details. DeFi projects often fail because of greed. The大道至简 (Great principles are simple), that's right. The InfoFi approach is correct; specialization is much more reliable than being all-encompassing. A bunch of flashy tools can actually hurt user experience. Quality > Quantity, I agree with this; many projects haven't understood this point. Simplification is indeed difficult, but it often tests true strength more than adding features.

View OriginalReply0

GameFiCritic

· 01-06 20:49

The theory of streamlining functions I’ve heard too many times. The key question is: how are the "best performing tools" in InfoFi defined? Is there data support? Or is it just a gut decision? --- DeFi projects all say the same thing, but in the end, it’s just stacking features to cut users. What sounds good is iteration, but in reality, it’s poor product capability. --- Quality > Quantity, that’s no problem, but the premise is to survive. Show us hard metrics like user retention rate, daily active users, ROI. --- It’s another "lean" story. The real question is: how many can truly stick with it? Most projects get deleted and die in the end. --- I agree. Too many DeFi products are greedy, resulting in being good at everything but weak at everything else. Focusing on perfecting one functional module and running the incentive mechanism well might be much better than throwing random punches at everything.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter420

· 01-06 20:49

Stop messing around with all the flashy stuff; core competitiveness is the key to success. --- Simplifying things is easy to say but hard to do; it all depends on whether they are willing to take action. --- I'm just worried that in the process of deleting, they might also remove what users need. --- Reliable, DeFi should be done this way; piling on features is actually a burden. --- But to be fair, now platforms all want to be all-in-one, so this level of restraint is quite rare. --- The logic of quality > quantity has long been proven on the chain; why do some people still not believe it? --- Is InfoFi being clever or just out of options? Who knows? --- Thumbs up for this idea; a clean and simple product is indeed more attractive.

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 01-06 20:36

Instead of piling up features, it's better to perfect the core. There's nothing wrong with this logic. However, there are few platforms that can truly execute it effectively...

View OriginalReply0