Walrus, a decentralized storage protocol based on Sui, has recently sparked quite a bit of discussion. Its native token WAL serves as the value carrier of the ecosystem, supporting a distributed storage system centered on privacy and security.



From a technical architecture perspective, Walrus's innovations are mainly reflected in two aspects. One is erasure coding — after splitting and encoding raw data, even if some storage nodes fail or go offline, the remaining fragments can still fully recover the data. This fault-tolerance mechanism is more efficient than traditional replication redundancy. The other is the blob storage mechanism, optimized specifically for unstructured large files, which significantly reduces storage costs through distributed management and eliminates single-point censorship risks.

What are the practical benefits of this scheme? The data speaks for itself: compared to traditional centralized cloud services, Walrus's storage costs have decreased by over 70%. More importantly, users truly control their data sovereignty and are no longer bound by centralized platforms.

On the functional level, the protocol offers mechanisms such as private transactions (transaction details and identities are hidden), governance participation (WAL holders can propose and vote), and staking incentives (users contribute resources and earn rewards). These designs enable Walrus to find applications in various scenarios including dApp development, enterprise data hosting, and personal privacy file protection.

As the Sui ecosystem expands, the imagination space for Walrus continues to grow — from decentralized media storage to sensitive information backup, new application scenarios are emerging. With technological iterations and increasing ecosystem participants, the potential for WAL value realization is worth paying attention to.
WAL-2.67%
SUI-1.21%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaRecktvip
· 10h ago
The concept of erasure coding really impressed me; a 70% cost reduction is no joke. The WAL token design is quite good; if the staking incentives work well, it can really be a bloodsucker. Speaking of Sui ecosystem projects, they are getting more and more wild; let's see who can truly survive. Walrus's data sovereignty promise sounds good, but how to ensure nodes don't act maliciously? This part wasn't elaborated on. The storage sector has long needed to be reshaped; the centralized cloud services model definitely needs to be smashed.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCoinSavantvip
· 01-06 21:52
ngl the 70% cost reduction claim hits different when you actually crunch the numbers... erasure coding thesis checks out from my regression analysis tho
Reply0
RugResistantvip
· 01-06 21:51
erasure coding sounds solid but... where's the actual audit? red flags detected on that "70% cost reduction" claim ngl
Reply0
ConfusedWhalevip
· 01-06 21:50
A 70% cost reduction sounds a bit unbelievable; it depends on how it performs in practice. Walrus really managed to create something new in the Sui ecosystem this time; eliminating encoding is indeed more convenient than redundant copying. Data sovereignty sounds good in theory, but will users really go through the trouble for privacy? Thinking about cloud storage, whether WAL is worth paying attention to depends on how the ecosystem develops later. Decentralized storage like this still seems suitable for niche scenarios; large-scale adoption is still a long way off.
View OriginalReply0
LiquiditySurfervip
· 01-06 21:40
A 70% reduction in costs sounds great, but how many scenarios can actually be used? I still think the most important thing is whether privacy can truly be implemented properly, and not end up becoming a new centralized monster in the end.
View OriginalReply0
NotSatoshivip
· 01-06 21:38
A 70% cost reduction sounds great, but can it really save that much in practice? Has WAL considered being used by projects outside the Sui ecosystem? The erase coding system is indeed smarter than copying redundancy, but with more nodes, will the review costs increase instead? As for storage costs, it really depends on which cloud service it benchmarks against. Privacy + low-cost storage—this combination really hits a lot of people's pain points. Regarding staking incentives, is the reward model clear or is it just another pie-in-the-sky promise? I'm a bit curious about the actual number of real users Walrus currently has... Blob storage sounds impressive, but how does it compare to Arweave or Filecoin? Why choose Walrus specifically? The selling point of data sovereignty is mentioned every year, but the key question is, who is actually using it?
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 01-06 21:34
Erasure coding is indeed excellent; a 70% cost reduction sounds unbelievable but also reasonable. We must keep an eye on WAL, as this type of underlying storage protocol is the most popular during the Sui ecosystem expansion phase. The combination of privacy + security—finally, someone is seriously working on decentralized storage. How long have we been talking about data sovereignty? Is there finally a practical solution being implemented? Looking forward to seeing the results. How is the blob storage optimization? How does the actual performance compare? Don’t tell me it’s just PPT tokens again. However, be cautious with staking incentives; a quick look can reveal whether the tokenomics have issues.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotDayLaborervip
· 01-06 21:32
A 70% cost reduction sounds crazy, but can this storage protocol really beat cloud service giants? --- Erasing the coding set is indeed clever, and the fault tolerance is much more aggressive than simple redundancy. --- It feels like another new narrative in the Sui ecosystem. Let's wait and see if it can really be implemented. --- I believe in data sovereignty, but will users really migrate from Google Cloud for privacy… that's a bit uncertain. --- The incentive mechanism of WAL is okay, but I wonder if it will become just another tool for cutting leeks. --- After so many years of pitfalls in distributed storage, what makes Walrus different? --- Staking can earn coins, which is definitely attractive enough to get people to try it out. --- Would companies dare to put sensitive data on this? It still depends on actual cases.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt