Ordinals completely changed people's perception of Bitcoin last year and also sparked this wave of meme enthusiasm. Under this trend, many new projects have begun exploring innovative token incentive models.



Recently, there has been an interesting phenomenon on BSC — some projects have adopted a distributed transaction trigger mechanism. Each transaction not only involves value transfer but also triggers propagation logic on the chain. In other words, every transaction you make participates in the ecosystem's growth feedback, and token holders' gains are no longer passive waiting but naturally earned through active market participation.

This logic is quite interesting. Compared to traditional static holding models, this mechanism links participation and rewards. The more frequent the transactions, the more active the ecosystem, and the stronger the support for the token's value. From a certain perspective, it’s more like turning the entire community into a self-optimizing network — the more participants, the lower the unit participation cost.

Of course, the risks and opportunities of such innovative projects are equally apparent. But for those who value ecosystem engagement and long-term growth, this new approach indeed offers a different realm of imagination.
ORDI-2.68%
BTC-0.43%
MEME-4.37%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationWatchervip
· 17h ago
Trading as mining sounds very attractive, but how long can it last? Isn't this just a disguised way to encourage rug pulls? The more frequently you trade, the faster you die. There are many such mechanisms on BSC, most of which don't last a month. That said, this logic does have some merit; it's much more reliable than just holding tokens for airdrops. The risks and opportunities are equally high; the problem is that most people only see the opportunities and overlook the risks. New projects do this all the time; in the end, it's just about who can tell the better story. It's somewhat like a Ponzi scheme variant—more and more people participate, yet the cost actually decreases? That's just absurd. The sense of participation is strong, but there's a risk of falling into a high-frequency trading trap. This is truly community-driven, which is more practical than air coins. To be honest, it still depends on the team and liquidity depth; no matter how good the mechanism is, it can't withstand a rug pull.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizardvip
· 18h ago
It's the same old story of trading and mining again. It sounds appealing but easily turns into a harvesting tool for retail investors. Relying on trading frequency to drive the ecosystem? It feels like just encouraging traders to rush orders. Where is the true value? This logic is deeply套路 (tricky), it depends on whether the team is genuinely committed or just running away after the pump and dump. Most of the projects on BSC are just fleeting, who knows if they'll still be around next month. It's somewhat interesting, but I'm still watching. Let's see if someone else steps into the pit first. Is paying the IQ tax or is it the next blue chip? Anyway, I won't get on the train for now. The more frequent the trading, the more active the ecosystem? Isn't that just the favorite excuse of manipulators to shake out investors? It feels like repeating history, just a different concept. It's not that magical. Lower participation costs sound good, but I always feel like it's just bloodsucking. I've seen too many projects like this, and they all end up the same.
View OriginalReply0
DataOnlookervip
· 01-07 21:50
Sounds like a new trick to cut leeks again, the more you trade, the more you make? Wake up, that's just encouraging you to trade every day. Basically the same old story: whoever invests early makes money, those who come later are just bagholders. I've heard a lot about this "self-optimizing network" theory, and they all seem similar. In the end, it just depends on who can run faster. If I was confident, I would have gone all in long ago, but it is indeed a bit interesting, I’ll keep an eye on it. There are so many projects like this on BSC, but how many can actually survive more than a month?
View OriginalReply0
TaxEvadervip
· 01-06 23:53
Trading is mining, sounds great, but what about in reality? Nice words, but isn't it just another scheme to cut the leeks again? The projects on BSC are getting more and more elaborate with their tactics. Lower participation costs? Why does it feel like gas fees have actually gone up? Ordinals did wake up a lot of people, but meme coins fade quickly after the hype. Feels a bit like marketing brainwashing. Distributed trading triggered? After all the circling, it's still the whales cutting in. It just feels like rephrasing liquidity mining. As expected from BSC, they can innovate in anything.
View OriginalReply0
MissingSatsvip
· 01-06 23:49
It's the same old story of trading and mining again. Sounds good, but when the price drops, the true nature is revealed. --- No matter how fancy the mechanism design on BSC is, in the end, it still depends on whether the team is reliable. --- Wait, the more frequent the transactions, the more profits? Isn't this just encouraging pump and dump? --- Feels like a new skin for Ponzi schemes. High participation = easy price manipulation. --- It's interesting, but I don't believe projects like this can survive the next bear market. --- Speaking of which, ordinals have definitely awakened many people, but most innovations on BSC have become tools for harvesting. --- Self-optimized network? Brother, you're flattering yourself. It's just liquidity mining with a different name.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTearjerkervip
· 01-06 23:48
Trading is mining, this gameplay sounds good, but it’s easy to turn into a game of hot potato. After Ordinals, they dare to innovate on everything, but this time it’s really a bit promising. Once again, I need to trade frequently to make a profit, a business of taking fees? Got it.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterXvip
· 01-06 23:37
Another "trading equals mining" scheme, sounds very appealing but can it really work out? Frequent trading = increased profits, this logic is a bit too idealistic, right? The BSC meme wave is indeed crazy, but it's always better to be cautious. The heat around Ordinals is on a completely different level; these new mechanisms are still far away. So basically, it's encouraging people to trade wildly; the more they trade, the more they lose. I've heard similar claims about self-optimizing networks since last year, but what was the result? Things that seem good often hide the greatest risks. Does anyone really make money from this, or is it just another scheme to fleece the retail investors?
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplantvip
· 01-06 23:31
Trading is mining, sounds good, but it's easy to get liquidated. Honestly, it still depends on whether there is a genuine user base. There are too many projects on BSC, so you need to be cautious. This logic has been played out long ago; they just rebrand and come back. But it is indeed more interesting than just holding coins and lying flat.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)