The most effective onchain funding model merges transparent public market mechanics with flexible private pricing structures. When you strip away the noise, what really matters for investors is the exit strategy—getting tangible returns when the project reaches a liquidity event. Everything else becomes secondary.

Here's where things get interesting: traditional VC and angel capital flows toward equity upside and exit multiples, not revenue streams. Revenue share agreements, especially those locked in from the start, often carry predatory undertones in venture circles. They signal desperation or weak unit economics. What moves real money into Web3 projects? Clear pathways to ownership value and exit opportunities.

The revenue buyback mechanism deserves a closer look too. It reshapes how value capture works in onchain ecosystems. Rather than relying on dilutive equity rounds, projects can use buyback mechanics to reward holders while maintaining lean capital structures. That's where onchain primitives genuinely outpace traditional models.