The artificial general intelligence race is shaping up to be messy and unpredictable. Underestimating key players in this game would be a critical mistake. The dynamics are complex—technical breakthroughs, capital allocation, talent competition all collide. Anyone betting against experienced builders with proven track records and deep pockets might find themselves on the wrong side of a rapidly shifting landscape. The AGI narrative is too consequential to dismiss any serious contender.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullAlarmvip
· 01-07 00:52
AGI this game is really complex, you need to watch the large capital flows and see who is accumulating chips. --- Don't be fooled by publicity; on-chain data is the real truth. You need to analyze the capital concentration of these "serious contenders." --- Haha, being experienced and having deep pockets means you can win? You need to look at their contract audit reports and large holder addresses to believe it. --- In the era of capital racing, the biggest risk isn't technological lag but smooth manipulation of funds. Be alert to early warning signs of exit scams during this AGI hype. --- What you're saying is correct but not specific enough. I'm more concerned about who is aggressively accumulating, as capital flows can reveal true intentions. --- Deep pockets ≠ reliable. Even the most successful project teams in history have exited scams; tracking addresses is the only way to be assured.
View OriginalReply0
AlphaWhisperervip
· 01-07 00:51
NGL, who will win this AGI war is really hard to say. It depends on who is more ruthless—capital or talent. Big companies are indeed wealthy, but don't underestimate those crazy entrepreneurs; history often surprises us. Going all-in on one side right now is too risky. Multi-chain thinking is the way to go. It sounds complicated, but basically it's just more money + stronger people + good luck = winning. By the way, who is most likely to overtake in a curve this round?
View OriginalReply0
MissedAirdropBrovip
· 01-07 00:35
I think this wave of the AGI battle is really a knife-tongued but soft-hearted situation; no one should be too arrogant. --- Capital wars are always a winner-takes-all game; it's a game for the wealthy, and we just watch the excitement. --- Honestly, watching these big shots compete makes me want to laugh. The ones who end up making money are those who all-in early on. --- Technical breakthroughs sound high-end, but frankly, it's about who can throw money into it. --- AGI is too intangible; it’s faster to just trade coins directly. --- Underestimating anyone is fine, but underestimating the scale of capital is not. --- Wait, doesn’t that mean we shouldn’t underestimate Musk and others... Got it, got it. --- Deep pockets determine the outcome; everything else is just floating clouds. --- I’ve never seen so many people all-in on the same track at the same time. Luckily, I was still sleeping.
View OriginalReply0
DegenTherapistvip
· 01-07 00:34
NGL, who will win this round of AGI is really hard to say. Throwing money has its advantages, but it can also easily backfire. Speaking of which, players with deep pockets are indeed often overestimated; a technical breakthrough is the real trump card. Wait, why does this article seem to be supporting the big players? Capital allocation is important, no doubt, but don’t forget the element of luck. The most formidable in AGI are often outsiders; besides, what does a track record really prove... Next year, let’s see how many of these contenders are still around. Breakthroughs are never caused by those going all-in; rather, it’s the seemingly inconspicuous ones. Honestly, this round of AGI competition is a gambler’s game—anyone dares to bet.
View OriginalReply0
ForkItAllDayvip
· 01-07 00:29
NGL, big players are fighting each other, small and medium projects are struggling to survive in the cracks. Anyone who dares to say they are definitely winning is really not far from a collapse.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerProfitvip
· 01-07 00:29
The agi arms race is so chaotic, no one should be too confident... The ones with money and talent are the real threat.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)