I've brought this up before, even when nobody wanted to hear it—the bags allocation model actually makes sense and arguably distributes value more fairly than alternatives. Here's the thing though: over time, the broader community starts viewing it as extractive. Participation fatigue sets in. People get tired.



But there's an upside that gets overlooked. When enough participants buy into this kind of structure, it genuinely improves how the crypto market perceives a project. It sends a signal about fairness and sustainability. The perception shift matters more than people think—it shapes long-term adoption and trust in the ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
fomo_fightervip
· 01-07 00:55
Honestly, I believe in this logic, I'm just worried that if I say it out loud, I'll get criticized for participation fatigue.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollectorvip
· 01-07 00:53
Nah, this perception game is the real hard currency; the teams haven't figured that out yet.
View OriginalReply0
RumbleValidatorvip
· 01-07 00:48
The bags allocation model... to put it simply, it's a perception game. Good data isn't as effective as meaningful signals.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLabvip
· 01-07 00:46
Talking about the bags distribution again? Theoretically, it's fair, but in reality, everyone is tired.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)