The health bands, watches, rings you use every day are constantly collecting your body data—heart rate, sleep, exercise, blood sugar… Where do these most private pieces of information actually reside?



Most of the time, they are stored on the cloud servers of a major internet company. Sounds a bit creepy, right? If there’s a data breach, server attack, or if the company mismanages or even goes bankrupt, your health data could be packaged and sold. Not to mention those inexplicable privacy policy clauses.

So the question is straightforward—can we truly control our own data destiny?

The answer is yes. The concept of decentralized storage completely reverses the traditional cloud service model. Take protocols like Walrus as an example: instead of storing your data in one centralized location, it encrypts your data first, then disperses it across a network of independent nodes around the world, like puzzle pieces. Even if most nodes fail, the remaining nodes can fully restore your data. Under this architecture, there is no centralized “data vault,” eliminating single points of failure.

What does this mean for health data? It means your private information truly belongs to you. You have full control over permissions—store it how you want, share it with whom you want, and even generate economic value through data authorization. For example, some health device manufacturers are already adopting this approach, allowing users to securely and freely share their health data.

This is the practical application of Web3 in daily life—not a hype about crypto trading, but returning data sovereignty to users.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkTonguevip
· 01-07 01:45
It should have been like this earlier; data sovereignty is not a luxury item. --- The Walrus solution sounds so comfortable; finally, I can shake off the feeling of being monitored. --- Wait, you mean health data can also generate economic value? Is my sleep data worth money too? Haha --- I've been wondering before, why does some big company get to free-ride on my heart rate data? Now there's finally a solution. --- Honestly, compared to those vague Web3 concepts, this can really be implemented, and it really moves me. --- Decentralized storage sounds less risky, but the more nodes there are, the higher the auditing costs, right? How do you ensure security in this area? --- I just want to know when I can start using it. Hopefully, it’s not another PPT project. --- Actually, we should have reflected earlier on why we give our most private data to internet companies. This article hits the point. --- Decentralized storage is a good direction, but can ordinary users really understand and trust it? --- Returning data sovereignty to users sounds good, but the premise is that these protocols themselves must be secure enough.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMongervip
· 01-07 01:45
nah, the real governance attack vector here is trusting any protocol claiming "true sovereignty"... walrus nodes? still vulnerable to consensus failure at scale, fr
Reply0
SudoRm-RfWallet/vip
· 01-07 01:41
This is the true return of sovereignty into our hands, much more reliable than those cloud giants.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpstervip
· 01-07 01:38
All my data is held by a certain vendor, and this is the real horror story.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 01-07 01:32
My Garmin wristband is watching me every day, really living under surveillance... Decentralized storage needs to be promoted quickly.
View OriginalReply0
ZenChainWalkervip
· 01-07 01:23
Wait, my data is still lying on a server of a major tech company? Who can stand that? Really, decentralized storage should have been popularized long ago. Protocols like Walrus are indeed interesting. The issue of data sovereignty—Web3 is doing the right thing, no exaggeration. Why should my health data be casually handled by those companies? It's time for reflection. Decentralized storage and controlling your own permissions—that's the real gameplay. Other solutions are just superficial. No wonder device manufacturers are starting to adopt this approach; users finally have a say. But honestly, only a few are truly doing decentralized well; most still stick to the centralized model. Data leaks, bankruptcy sales... these risks must be guarded against. The decentralized approach is correct. Finally, someone has explained the true meaning of Web3 clearly—it's not just about trading coins.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)