A founder of a compliant platform openly shared on social media the reasons behind his recent stock reduction. He straightforwardly said: "Yes, I sold some, but think about it—I've been an entrepreneur for 13 years. If I still keep 99.999% of my net assets tightly tied to a single stock, isn't that just gambler's logic?"

He further explained the necessity of this decision. Over the long-term entrepreneurial journey, if wealth accumulated is overly concentrated in a single asset, regardless of how high-quality that asset is, the risks are significant—this is basic asset allocation knowledge. Diversification not only reduces risk but also provides more flexibility.

However, he also emphasized a key point: "Speaking of which, most of my net assets are actually still..." This statement hints that, despite moderate diversification adjustments, he still maintains core confidence and capital commitment to the platform he created.

This perspective reflects an interesting phenomenon: even founders and major shareholders need to follow fundamental risk management principles when managing personal wealth. Long-term holding versus moderate reduction is never an either-or choice but a balance found between confidence and rationality. For investors paying attention to exchange dynamics and founder decisions, this logic is also worth learning from.