Why is it so difficult for small and medium-sized enterprises to get financing? Essentially, it's the old problem of information asymmetry. There's an interesting idea—record all data from each link in the supply chain onto the blockchain in real-time, so that financial institutions can directly verify transactions through smart contracts. Based on these on-chain data, banks and other financial institutions are willing to provide financing services.



The benefits of this programmable credit system are obvious. On one hand, it significantly reduces the costs and complexity of transaction verification, and trade frictions are noticeably decreased; on the other hand, the financing pathways for small and medium-sized enterprises are activated, and the entire supply chain finance ecosystem becomes more vibrant. From data on the chain to smart contract automation, this closed loop truly changes the game.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
VCsSuckMyLiquidityvip
· 3h ago
Alright, integrating the supply chain onto the blockchain can indeed solve the information gap. But will banks really dare to lend based solely on on-chain data? That's a bit optimistic.
View OriginalReply0
GhostChainLoyalistvip
· 7h ago
Who will guarantee the authenticity of on-chain data? That's the key, isn't it?
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 01-07 18:51
Honestly, this set of theories sounds perfect, but how many small and medium-sized enterprises actually go on the blockchain? The key is whether someone is willing to adopt it.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObservervip
· 01-07 18:51
To be honest, I am optimistic about the logic of on-chain data verification, but the problem is whether small and medium-sized enterprises are willing to make all their supply chain data transparent and on-chain. It might just lead to a prolonged back-and-forth.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 01-07 18:49
On-chain data indeed solves the trust issue, but will small and medium-sized enterprises really cooperate to make transaction data fully transparent... --- To put it nicely, it's programmable credit; to be blunt, it just exposes all of the company's trade secrets. --- This logic sounds great, but how about actual implementation? Will financial institutions really feel comfortable lending just because of on-chain data? --- Supply chain finance is already a tough nut to crack. Can adding a smart contract solve the fundamental problem? Or is it just another fantasy of technological saviors? --- Honestly, after information symmetry is achieved, who bears the risk transfer? This question hasn't been fully understood. --- Putting data on the chain is fine, but the key is who gets to define what "real transactions" are—this power is not insignificant.
View OriginalReply0
BridgeJumpervip
· 01-07 18:45
When will on-chain data truly address the fundamental issue of financing difficulties? It still feels like a superficial fix.
View OriginalReply0
ThesisInvestorvip
· 01-07 18:37
On-chain credit systems sound good, but the key is whether banks are willing to actually use them.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicatorvip
· 01-07 18:22
Really? Can on-chain supply chain management solve financing difficulties? It sounds great, but I always feel like something's not quite right...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)