In early 2026, the precious metals market performance was somewhat disappointing. Gold, silver, and platinum group metals all declined simultaneously, directly ending the previous upward trend.



Once the specific numbers came out, the magnitude of the move was clear — spot gold briefly fell below $4,430 per ounce, with a single-day drop of over 1.4%, and New York gold futures also shrank to around $4,477. Silver fell even more sharply, with a decline of 4.6%, touching a low of $76.37 per ounce, and COMEX silver futures dropped over 3%. Platinum group metals were even more extreme, with spot platinum sliding over 7% in a single day, and palladium falling more than 5%, hitting recent lows. Domestic markets were not spared either, with the main contract of Shanghai silver futures dropping to 19,214 yuan per kilogram, a decline of nearly 2%.

Why did the market suddenly become so intense? Essentially, it’s due to Bloomberg Commodity Index adjusting its annual weights. Although this seems simple, it actually causes a big impact. According to the new plan, the gold weight drops from 19.6% to 14.9%, and silver even more drastically, from 7.7% down to 3.9%. What does this mean? Passive funds tracking this index, which could reach a scale of hundreds of billions, need to complete rebalancing within the window from January 8 to 14. This operation is expected to generate about $9 billion in technical selling, corresponding to 3% of total gold holdings and 9% of total silver holdings.

Combined with a large amount of accumulated profit-taking from earlier, these factors together became the final straw that broke the market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockchainBrokenPromisevip
· 01-07 18:53
Bloomberg's move this time is just institutions cutting leeks; can a trillion-dollar fund rebalancing be gentle? We're retail investors just along for the ride.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseHermitvip
· 01-07 18:51
Damn, it's another technical sell-off. A passive fund worth hundreds of billions adjusting its holdings directly wrecked the market. I should have known to avoid this window period.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 01-07 18:48
Oh my, Bloomberg's move to adjust the weighting directly trapped us inside. Silver was cut from 7.7% to 3.9%. Isn't this clearly smashing the market?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFreedomvip
· 01-07 18:42
Bloomberg's move to adjust directly caused a market crash, forcing the trillion-dollar fund to offload assets. No wonder silver is dropping so sharply.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBotvip
· 01-07 18:30
Bloomberg's recent rebalancing is truly remarkable, smashing $9 billion in sell-offs and directly halving silver's weight, no wonder the decline is so sharp. --- It's also the fault of passive funds. During a billion-dollar rebalancing window, technical selling immediately produces this effect. --- Profit-taking + weight adjustments, a double blow that the market can't withstand. Is this what they call a black swan? --- Silver was cut from 7.7% to 3.9%. It feels like there will be more fluctuations later; let's wait and see if we can catch the bottom. --- As expected, precious metals can't escape institutional manipulation; retail investors are just the background. --- Spot platinum dropped over 7%, palladium also hit a new low. When will this cycle rebound?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)