The story of the internet has been told for decades, with a core logic: platforms control data and platform profits. In Web3, this script is about to be reversed.



From a different perspective, data in the internet era is like "crude oil," requiring platforms to refine it to generate value; in the Web3 era, there's a new approach—making data directly tradable as "refined commodities." This shift sounds simple, but in reality, it represents a paradigm leap from "I own your data" to "I can verify the authenticity of the data."

What is the traditional internet model? Platform = owner of data. Users produce content, platforms own, control, and monetize it, resulting in data monopolies and privacy issues everywhere. Web3 aims to solve this by returning data ownership to users, but there's a tough problem: now that users own their data, how can third parties verify that the data is genuine and complete without trusting the platform?

This is where verifiable storage layers like Walrus come into play. Their approach is as follows: user data is stored in Walrus's decentralized network, with ownership always belonging to the user; any DApp or smart contract can verify the authenticity and integrity of the data directly through on-chain stored data hashes, without any trust relationships, and then trigger corresponding logic. In other words, data is neither controlled by any platform nor unreliable; it can reliably generate credit, drive contract execution, and support asset minting.

In this system, the role of the WAL token is clear: it is the fuel for the "data verification economy." It pays storage nodes, serves as the settlement unit for global verification services, and its value is proportional to the network's overall demand for trusted data.

Therefore, what Walrus is doing is not just providing storage space but building the infrastructure for Web3-native data value exchange—allowing data to create genuine, trustworthy value without being "owned."
WAL14.71%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BoredApeResistancevip
· 01-07 18:56
Sounds good, but the reality is that most users don't care about data ownership; they just want easy and affordable services. WAL's logic is clear, but the question is who will incentivize the nodes, and is the cost high? Data verification economics sound nice, but I still want to know how much can be earned. Can Walrus succeed? It feels like another grand vision. Returning ownership to users sounds great, but do users really understand verification? Once this infrastructure is built, what will the user experience be like? Will it still be complicated?
View OriginalReply0
BlindBoxVictimvip
· 01-07 18:55
Oh my god, someone finally clarified the issue of data ownership. I used to think Web3 was just switching platforms to get exploited again. The platform control over data trick is getting old; it needs to change. Walrus sounds like it could really solve the verification problem, but it depends on how it is implemented. Another new concept, I have to study it all over again. It’s really exhausting. It still feels like the trust issue hasn't been fully resolved. Whether verification is reliable or not still needs to be proven through practice. Whether the WAL token can succeed depends mainly on the network scale. Its use in a small ecosystem is limited. Data value exchange sounds impressive, but do users really care about ownership? Honestly, as long as it’s enjoyable to use, that’s enough.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 01-07 18:54
Data ownership sounds great, but can it really verify authenticity? Easier said than done.
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractDivervip
· 01-07 18:50
The key is that someone actually uses it, otherwise it's just a castle in the air. Web3 has been talked about for so long—data ownership, privacy protection... all sound right, but ordinary users don't care at all; they just want convenience. Walrus indeed solves the trust issue, but at what cost? Could it be more expensive than centralized solutions? Data verifiability is a good thing, but can the verification economy be sustained? It still feels like concepts outweigh applications. Internet giants will never willingly give up their data dominance; the real confrontation is just beginning.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathonervip
· 01-07 18:48
honestly, we're still in the early miles of this adoption curve. walrus solving the verification problem without trust layers? that's the kind of fundamental shift that compounds over quarters, not days. been accumulating quality infrastructure plays since the last cycle—this is just another water station for the ultra-marathon runners 🏃
Reply0
BridgeTrustFundvip
· 01-07 18:42
Sounds good, but can it really turn around the stubborn problem of data monopoly? I get the idea of Walrus—verify without owning, sounds elegant. The question is, will users actively manage their data? Most people are still too lazy to bother. WAL tokens are linked to demand... this logic makes sense, it all depends on how big the ecosystem can grow. Turning data directly into a commodity is indeed revolutionary, but this approach still needs to prove it can get off the ground. It feels like we're back to the old problem—who will maintain the credibility of this decentralized network?
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizervip
· 01-07 18:27
Wait, I buy the analogy of data shifting from oil to commodities, but can Walrus really solve the trust issue? It still sounds like we need a trusted node.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt