Early-stage crypto projects often stumble due to overambitious valuations, excessive fundraising targets, and underwhelming technology fundamentals. It's a pattern worth examining.



Looking at recent ICO structures, there's a stark difference in approach. Consider a project raising $2.5m against a $20m fully diluted valuation—this pricing sits notably below the sector average. The risk-reward profile becomes considerably more favorable when you compare it against the typical bloated valuations we've seen derailing countless projects.

The math here matters. Lower initial valuations leave room for sustainable growth without requiring unrealistic adoption metrics just to achieve returns. When teams aren't forced to chase $50m+ raises and massive user bases to justify their cap, they can actually focus on shipping working products.

This doesn't guarantee success, but it does suggest a more grounded approach to early crypto fundraising.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LoneValidatorvip
· 7h ago
Finally, someone is talking about this. Too many project fundings are just digging their own graves.
View OriginalReply0
MoonBoi42vip
· 9h ago
To be honest, I've seen quite a few projects with undervalued financing, but very few projects can truly stick to not making empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroJunkievip
· 01-07 19:03
This is a pragmatic approach to fundraising, unlike some projects that boast extravagantly right from the start.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 01-07 19:03
To be honest, $2.5M relative to $20M feels much more comfortable, and it's more reliable than those projects that constantly hype themselves as sky-high prices.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStackingvip
· 01-07 19:02
Honestly, 2.5 million out of 20 million is a comfortable ratio. It's much more reliable than those projects that come out and boast about 50 million right away.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯vip
· 01-07 19:01
Early project valuation games, to be honest, are still about the team's greed. Raising 25 million with a valuation of 2 billion is really more considerate.
View OriginalReply0
PrivacyMaximalistvip
· 01-07 19:00
Someone finally said it: those projects with sky-high valuations deserve to die; undervaluation is the true way to go.
View OriginalReply0
BackrowObservervip
· 01-07 18:34
Finally, someone has spoken out. In the past two years, crypto funding has been just about arbitrary pricing, as long as they can raise money...
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)