I have added a few low-market-cap meme coins to my custom portfolio. I am quite optimistic about the teams behind these projects. If on-chain activity picks up, these tokens should perform well.



Recently, trading opportunities for new coin pairs have been hard to grasp. Instead of frequent trading, it's better to directly buy those projects with low prices and strong teams. This strategy is relatively more stable.
MEME-3.07%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ForkLibertarianvip
· 01-07 20:53
Relying on low-market-cap meme coins like this, is it really trustworthy? Is the team really reliable? Just because the team is optimistic doesn't necessarily mean it will gain volume; on-chain activity is what truly matters. Being cheap doesn't necessarily mean there's an opportunity; this logic is a bit flawed. Frequent trading indeed results in losses, but going all-in on low-market-cap coins is also a gamble. Is the price really stable when it's cheap? I think this is survivor bias. The team may be capable, but that doesn't guarantee the coin's price will give face. Did you review their code before buying? New coins are indeed hard to grasp, but low-market-cap coins are not necessarily easy to copy. This operation mode sounds stable, but in reality, it's just constantly gambling.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleWatchervip
· 01-07 20:52
Low-market-cap meme coin gambling teams, I've heard this trick several times before, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorervip
· 01-07 20:49
Low-market-cap meme coins really depend on whether the team is reliable or not, otherwise it's just gambling. Wait, what are the names of those projects you mentioned? It’s hard to judge. Frequent trading indeed容易亏损, but not all cheap ones necessarily have strength... This logic seems reversed? Honestly, ninety percent of meme coins are just to scam retail investors, your approach is a bit risky. On-chain activity isn't always real-time, by the time you notice, it might have already peaked. This strategy sounds pretty solid, but who can handle the risks of low-market-cap coins? Having confidence in the team is a prerequisite, but meme coin teams also run away pretty quickly...
View OriginalReply0
HashRatePhilosophervip
· 01-07 20:47
I'm also watching low-market-cap memes, but are you sure the team is real? You're right, instead of chasing new coins every day, it's more reliable to hold a few potential stocks. The most important thing is that the team has strength, and I share this mindset. Frequent trading just hands money over to exchanges; it's better to stick to a good track and hold steady. On-chain activity is what truly matters; I've seen too many false booms before.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 01-07 20:44
According to the tokenomics model in the white paper, the liquidity fragility of low-market-cap meme coins has been definitively proven. Whether your hypothesis holds true in a highly volatile market environment remains to be seen.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)