From an entrepreneur's perspective, I am quite optimistic about the prospects of AI in the healthcare sector, especially in the application scenarios for 2B and 2G (government and large institutions).



What is the reality? Taking North America as an example, the healthcare system has been in a state of supply not meeting demand. For instance, in Vancouver—emergency services are directly accessible, but for routine check-ups, patients must be referred by a family doctor to see a specialist. The problem is, finding a family doctor willing to accept new patients? Waiting in line for over 2 years is not uncommon. Even if you finally find one, scheduling a meeting requires booking several weeks in advance, and the appointment usually lasts no more than 15 minutes.

The inefficiency of this system is obvious. If AI healthcare solutions can improve overall efficiency, it would be a huge benefit for both patients and healthcare providers. But here’s the reality—government and large institutions tend to respond slowly.

On the flip side, this is precisely where entrepreneurs have opportunities. Solutions that can achieve "middle-layer optimization" not only help large institutions improve their experience but also enhance patient satisfaction. Such innovative projects have great potential.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BrokenRugsvip
· 20h ago
Yes, medical AI definitely has potential, but waiting for government response might take forever.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctorvip
· 01-09 03:44
Queuing in Vancouver for 2 years is a bit outrageous... But looking at it from another perspective, it just proves that there is a real market gap. However, if entrepreneurs really want to tap into this market, they need to be mentally prepared — government procurement cycles can be even more challenging than fundraising.
View OriginalReply0
CodeSmellHuntervip
· 01-07 22:46
It takes 2 years to get a family doctor registered. Is this system still far from collapse...
View OriginalReply0
FlatlineTradervip
· 01-07 22:46
To be honest, 2B and 2G are really profitable but too competitive... The healthcare system in North America is incredibly bad, but the problem is that by the time the government reacts, AI will already be outdated.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 01-07 22:36
Getting registered in Vancouver for two years and laughing myself to death. This is exactly where AI should really step in.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWizardvip
· 01-07 22:31
actually, vancouver's 2-year wait for a gp hits different when you run the math on it... that's statistically significant opportunity cost right there. but here's the thing—government adoption rates historically track at like 15-20% per annum, empirically speaking. so the "middle layer" play? theoretically sound, but the capital efficiency metrics get messy fast
Reply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)