Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Have you ever encountered this kind of dilemma—seeing a proposal for a blockchain project repeatedly discussed within the community, only to find that the voting results come out after weeks or even months? Recently, ListaDAO introduced a new approach called the "48-Hour Governance Fast Lane." As a community participant, I experienced it firsthand, and honestly, the gains were significant.
This mechanism is quite interesting: important proposals can go through an accelerated channel where community members focus discussion and voting within two days. Once the results are out, the code is executed immediately, making the entire process smooth and efficient. It might sound a bit abstract, but an example will make it clear—you see, their first fast lane decision was to permanently burn tokens representing 20% of the total supply. The decision was made without fuss, and they just did it.
Think about it—such a major economic adjustment would typically take a month of repeated deliberation in traditional processes. But with ListaDAO? A lively weekend of discussion, and by Monday, it was confirmed on-chain. Is it fast or what?
But behind the speed, the way work is done is quietly changing. Participants need to concentrate intensely in a short period, make rational judgments, and then collectively approve the decision. To encourage genuine engagement, ListaDAO set up a governance incentive mechanism—not based on how many tokens you hold, but on whether you have truly invested effort in research and voting participation. This way, the voices of small retail investors and large holders are relatively balanced. Community activity has noticeably increased, and more people are willing to speak up.
Of course, the speed also raises questions. Is forty-eight hours really enough for decision-makers to consider the long-term impacts? Could rushing lead to overlooking key details? Additionally, who decides which proposals can enter the fast lane? Does this power truly decentralize itself? These are serious questions the community is actively contemplating.