European central bankers have aligned on a contentious issue: justifying the Federal Reserve's $3 billion allocation toward renovating headquarters when estimates suggest the actual cost should fall in the low hundreds of millions.



The math simply doesn't add up. A facility of that scale shouldn't command such an astronomical budget. Yet the Fed has absorbed the expense while simultaneously reporting cumulative losses exceeding $200 billion.

This raises uncomfortable questions about fiscal discipline and resource allocation within the world's most powerful monetary institution. How sustainable is this spending trajectory? What's the actual return on such capital deployment? For those tracking institutional efficiency and monetary policy execution, these numbers warrant serious scrutiny.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
TrustMeBrovip
· 7h ago
The Fed's move this time is really amazing, spending 3 billion to renovate the headquarters? Just spending money, huh?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichTradervip
· 7h ago
3 billion renovation of headquarters, the actual cost is only a few hundred million... Who will settle this account? Losing over 200 billion and still burning money, it's outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
InfraVibesvip
· 7h ago
Hmm... The Federal Reserve spends 3 billion to renovate its headquarters? Is that true? Things that could be done with a few hundred million are made so complicated?
View OriginalReply0
GigaBrainAnonvip
· 8h ago
The Fed's accounting is really impressive. 3 billion to renovate the headquarters? I just want to ask how this money was spent. Over 200 billion in losses and still pretending to be wealthy.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHuntervip
· 8h ago
The Fed's move is really brilliant. Spending 3 billion to renovate the headquarters, with actual costs only a few hundred million, and they still lost over 200 billion. Who the hell came up with this logic?
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)