Probably not the only one thinking this way—we really don't need so many fintech wrapper projects flooding the space. And it's not about being a purist either. The thing is, these projects fundamentally don't leverage what blockchain actually brings to the table. Honestly, they could accomplish everything on a private network without breaking a sweat. The bells and whistles of decentralization are wasted on projects that don't actually need it. It's like using a tank to deliver groceries—technically possible, but completely missing the point.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-addcaaf7vip
· 4h ago
Honestly, running these things on a public chain is just overengineering. Private databases can handle this easily; there's no need to put it on the blockchain. It's funny.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathonervip
· 4h ago
ngl this is exactly where i've been stuck for months. just like mile 15 of an ultra—everyone's chasing the glitzy aid stations instead of focusing on actual distance. these wrapper projects are just noise in the accumulation phase, honestly.
Reply0
MetaMaskedvip
· 5h ago
Exactly right, a bunch of projects are just putting a layer of chain on top, but essentially it's still centralized stuff. There's really no need to insist on going on-chain.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 5h ago
Honestly, these projects are a disgrace to blockchain, and true decentralization has been ruined.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)