Real infrastructure beats hype every time. What actually matters on-chain: randomness that doesn't rely on a single weak point—think oracle-anchored systems that spread trust across the network. Then there's proof efficiency: zk and signature aggregation that genuinely reduce gas costs on Layer 2 solutions, not just theoretical gains. Add in MEV-aware mechanisms like time-locked burn-to-probe, and you've got something with teeth.



How do you measure if this stuff works? Look at failed transaction rates. That's the real litmus test—clean infrastructure shows up in the numbers, not the marketing.
ZK4.69%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropHarvestervip
· 6h ago
Really, gas fees never lie... Just look at the transaction failure rate to see who's full of it.
View OriginalReply0
ForkPrincevip
· 6h ago
Damn it, it's another bunch of nonsense wrapped in technical jargon. The real issue is one thing—can the gas fees really be lowered?
View OriginalReply0
TokenTaxonomistvip
· 6h ago
failed tx rates, yeah that's the one metric nobody's gaming yet. problem is half the chains can't even report this cleanly—data suggests otherwise from what they claim tbh. oracle diversity sounds good until you actually map the attack surfaces, then it gets taxonomically messy fast.
Reply0
WagmiWarriorvip
· 6h ago
Honestly, the failure rate indicator is amazing; finally, someone is telling the truth.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)