SNEK token keeps climbing, and here's what stands out—the team publicly claimed they had zero involvement in these moves. But is that credible? The evidence suggests otherwise. Looking at the trading patterns and timing, there's a pretty compelling case that core team members were orchestrating pump-and-dump activity behind the scenes. It raises serious questions about project governance and whether early backers got the full transparency they deserved. When a team denies involvement yet the data points to coordinated movements, that's when community trust starts eroding fast.

SNEK8.69%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RegenRestorervip
· 5h ago
Same old story, saying they didn't participate just because they didn't join? On-chain data has already exposed them.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedianvip
· 5h ago
Zero participation? Ha, only a fool would believe that excuse.
View OriginalReply0
BloodInStreetsvip
· 5h ago
It's the same old story again—denial from the team, data speaks for itself, always the same old trick. Early investors who jumped in should wake up.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetectivevip
· 5h ago
Same old tricks again: denial, shifting blame, data lying
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 5h ago
Same old story, the team is "zero involvement"? I spit on that, on-chain data is right there.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)