#Flow网络安全事故 After watching Flow's "ecosystem internal war," the string in my heart was pulled tight again. The $3.9 million theft was already frustrating enough, but what really made me alert was the official emergency decision-making process — the rollback plan was released, and key bridging partners like deBridge and LayerZero were not informed in advance, and were directly cut off during the rollback window.

This is the risk blind spot I have always emphasized: when on-chain ecosystems become highly complex, a single technical decision can trigger a systemic storm. The attacker’s funds had long been moved cross-chain, and the rollback was harmless to hackers, but it treated honest users and ecosystem partners as "costs." The $220,000 USDC in cross-chain custody and deBridge’s $200,000 funds — these are real secondary damages.

Fortunately, Flow listened to the opposition and abandoned the rollback in favor of an isolated recovery plan, which shows there is still hope. But this incident reminded me: before participating in any emerging ecosystem, you must ask three questions — who holds governance power? What is the emergency mechanism in extreme cases? How strong is the risk-bearing capacity of cross-chain bridging? The mistake Flow made this time, someone else might make next time.

FOMO is never more important than safety.