Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Meta just blocked over 544,000 Instagram and Facebook accounts in Australia as part of their youth protection policy rollout. It's a massive enforcement action—the kind of move that raises questions worth thinking through.
On one hand, you've got legitimate concerns about protecting minors from harmful content. Fair enough. But here's where it gets interesting: a single company making unilateral decisions to remove half a million accounts with little transparency is exactly the kind of centralized control that crypto communities have been pushing back against.
No public audit trail. No appeal process visible to users. Just gone. And while Instagram's terms of service technically allow this, it highlights a fundamental difference between traditional platforms and the decentralized alternatives being built in Web3 right now.
Australia's been aggressive on tech regulation lately, and this move suggests Meta's tightening the screws to stay ahead of potential government mandates. Smart business move, maybe. But it's also a reminder: when a company controls the infrastructure where you store your identity and data, you're ultimately playing by their rules. No different from how centralized exchanges work—except it's your social life at stake, not just your crypto.